From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 24 May 2007 21:41:24 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.13]:45991 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20022040AbXEXUlX (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 21:41:23 +0100 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp1.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id l4OKeIOw016981 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 24 May 2007 13:40:19 -0700 Received: from akpm.corp.google.com (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with SMTP id l4OKeFTF002013; Thu, 24 May 2007 13:40:15 -0700 Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:40:15 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Alan Cox Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Roman Zippel , Linux Kernel Development , rmk@arm.linux.kernel.org, spyro@f2s.com, , , "Luck, Tony" , , chris@zankel.net, , kyle@parisc-linux.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: Enable arbitary speed tty support Message-Id: <20070524134015.e89843db.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070523205645.07b03581@the-village.bc.nu> References: <20070523174446.37abfa7a@the-village.bc.nu> <20070523205645.07b03581@the-village.bc.nu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.179 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 207.189.120.13 Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 15160 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: akpm@linux-foundation.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Alan, I'm all dazed and confused about these patches: arm-enable-arbitary-speed-tty-ioctls-and-split.patch arm26-enable-arbitary-speed-tty-ioctls-and-split.patch ia64-arbitary-speed-tty-ioctl-support.patch xtensa-enable-arbitary-tty-speed-setting-ioctls.patch h8300-enable-arbitary-speed-tty-port-setup.patch m32r-enable-arbitary-speed-tty-rate-setting.patch etrax-enable-arbitary-speed-setting-on-tty-ports.patch v850-enable-arbitary-speed-tty-ioctls.patch lots-of-architectures-enable-arbitary-speed-tty-support.patch are there any interdependencies here, or can the various patches go into the various trees in random order without ill effects? Thanks. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.13]:45991 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20022040AbXEXUlX (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 21:41:23 +0100 Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:40:15 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: Enable arbitary speed tty support Message-ID: <20070524134015.e89843db.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070523205645.07b03581@the-village.bc.nu> References: <20070523174446.37abfa7a@the-village.bc.nu> <20070523205645.07b03581@the-village.bc.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org To: Alan Cox Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Roman Zippel , Linux Kernel Development , rmk@arm.linux.kernel.org, spyro@f2s.com, starvik@axis.com, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, "Luck, Tony" , takata@linux-m32r.org, chris@zankel.net, uclinux-v850@lsi.nec.co.jp, kyle@parisc-linux.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Message-ID: <20070524204015.U0vOj4h3obqQPcNCgXHvq01VCCVePFOjYlvSvQMBzgo@z> Alan, I'm all dazed and confused about these patches: arm-enable-arbitary-speed-tty-ioctls-and-split.patch arm26-enable-arbitary-speed-tty-ioctls-and-split.patch ia64-arbitary-speed-tty-ioctl-support.patch xtensa-enable-arbitary-tty-speed-setting-ioctls.patch h8300-enable-arbitary-speed-tty-port-setup.patch m32r-enable-arbitary-speed-tty-rate-setting.patch etrax-enable-arbitary-speed-setting-on-tty-ports.patch v850-enable-arbitary-speed-tty-ioctls.patch lots-of-architectures-enable-arbitary-speed-tty-support.patch are there any interdependencies here, or can the various patches go into the various trees in random order without ill effects? Thanks.