From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753545AbXEXVAw (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 17:00:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750849AbXEXVAp (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 17:00:45 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:38885 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750811AbXEXVAo (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 17:00:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 22:59:34 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Balbir Singh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Mike Galbraith , Arjan van de Ven , Thomas Gleixner , pranith-kumar_d@mentorg.com, Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v14 Message-ID: <20070524205934.GA19672@elte.hu> References: <20070523120616.GA23407@elte.hu> <20070524064235.GA2386@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20070524080959.GA29151@elte.hu> <4655CA84.5060103@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4655CA84.5060103@goop.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > nice! I've merged your patch and it built/booted fine so it should show > > up in -v15. This should also play well with Andi's sched_clock() > > enhancements in -mm, slated for .23. > > > > BTW, does CFS treat sched_clock as a per-cpu clock, or will it compare > time values of sched_clock()s called on different CPUs? it treats it as a per-cpu clock. Ingo