From: Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@enter.net>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@gmail.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm-cc@laptop.org,
linuxcompressed-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Richard Purdie <richard@openedhand.com>,
Bret Towe <magnade@gmail.com>,
Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 15:51:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705281551.05506.dhazelton@enter.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070528170109.GP3899@stusta.de>
On Monday 28 May 2007 13:01:09 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:55:14AM -0400, Daniel Hazelton wrote:
> >...
> > This is my guess as well. Though performance will likely drop when I make
> > the noinline macro mean something. (This may be offset by figuring out a
> > way to make likely() and unlikely() also have a meaningful effect in
> > userspace). ...
>
> What is your problem?
>
> The likely/unlikely macros aren't in any way depending on any kernel
> infrastructure.
That I'm just plain lazy and haven't felt like pulling them out of the kernel
sources ?
Actually, that is the case - and I wasn't exactly sure that likely() and
unlikely() were completely decoupled from the kernel's infrastructure.
DRH
> > DRH
>
> cu
> Adrian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-28 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-28 14:34 [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6 Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 14:40 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 14:49 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 15:06 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 15:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-28 16:03 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 17:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-28 19:59 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 20:18 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 20:52 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 5:55 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29 8:08 ` Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-29 11:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-29 12:03 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29 13:13 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 21:10 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-29 21:26 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-30 5:31 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-30 13:56 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2007-05-30 14:24 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-28 15:30 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-28 15:47 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 15:55 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 17:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-28 19:51 ` Daniel Hazelton [this message]
2007-05-28 15:49 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 22:57 ` Bret Towe
2007-05-29 5:48 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29 13:09 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 22:53 ` Bret Towe
2007-05-28 22:58 ` Bret Towe
2007-05-29 5:58 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29 20:14 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 20:33 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 21:48 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 23:32 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-30 5:19 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29 8:17 ` Makefile question (was [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6) Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-29 10:41 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-29 10:51 ` Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-29 11:27 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-29 13:33 ` JFFS2 using 'private' zlib header " Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-29 13:43 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 15:15 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-29 16:20 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-30 5:31 ` Mark Adler
2007-05-30 13:05 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-30 13:30 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 23:02 ` Mark Adler
2007-05-30 23:26 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-06-01 3:06 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-06-01 17:24 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 13:41 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-05-30 15:46 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-05-30 16:12 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 16:43 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-05-29 20:48 ` [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6 Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-30 5:54 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-30 8:31 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-30 10:47 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-31 12:34 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-31 18:21 ` Satyam Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200705281551.05506.dhazelton@enter.net \
--to=dhazelton@enter.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm-cc@laptop.org \
--cc=linuxcompressed-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=magnade@gmail.com \
--cc=nitingupta910@gmail.com \
--cc=richard@openedhand.com \
--cc=satyam.sharma@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.