From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Indan Zupancic <indan@nul.nu>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix section mismatch warnings in mtrr
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 22:04:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070528200434.GC31233@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705271156.22098.ak@suse.de>
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 11:56:21AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> >
> > So section mismatch warnings are more about catching sloopy usage of __init than it is to
> > catch potential kernel oopesen. But the latter is a nice side effect that is appreciated.
>
> My point was that I cannot recall a single real oops bug found by the compile
> time checking.
>
> We had a few in the past, but since we poison init data after boot they all tended
> to be found quickly anyways.
It's far better to find the bugs during build time than during run-time.
> But the warnings just seem to require endless changes and bogus changes
> (randomly moving code which was actually ok because it only called
> in the init case).
The main culprint is probarly that the warnings are so vocal.
Everyone see them for each kernel-build that touches one file.
And then everyone and their cousin try to fix them.
When we are down to a warning-free x86 build things will start to look different.
And I will do my to make us get there - as time permits.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-28 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-19 10:43 2.6.22-rc2: section mismatch Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-19 11:00 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-05-19 11:25 ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-05-19 13:30 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-19 13:27 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-19 13:32 ` [PATCH] x86: fix section mismatch warnings in mtrr Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-19 13:55 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-19 14:09 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-21 13:39 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-21 13:48 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-21 13:50 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-21 13:52 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-21 15:11 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-26 12:07 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-26 16:02 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-27 9:05 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-27 9:56 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-27 17:57 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-28 20:04 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2007-05-27 11:39 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070528200434.GC31233@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arvidjaar@mail.ru \
--cc=bwalle@suse.de \
--cc=indan@nul.nu \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.