From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3D5DE004 for ; Wed, 30 May 2007 04:49:35 +1000 (EST) From: Arnd Bergmann To: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: Saving to 32 bits of GPRs in signal context Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 20:48:21 +0200 References: <1180423456.19517.124.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200705291628.35852.arnd@arndb.de> <624dd5293b5fde0ffdf01ea692c32e9c@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <624dd5293b5fde0ffdf01ea692c32e9c@kernel.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200705292048.22569.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Steve Munroe , Ulrich Weigand , Paul Mackerras , Anton Blanchard List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tuesday 29 May 2007, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > right, as mentioned before, IP32L64 would imply introducing a new > > ABI, which we don't want. > > Hey, you could hijack the mswindows ABI, no need to > define your own ;-) Windows is IL32P64, not IP32L64 Arnd <><