From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754489AbXE3Wgt (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2007 18:36:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753727AbXE3Wgj (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2007 18:36:39 -0400 Received: from waste.org ([66.93.16.53]:42474 "EHLO waste.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753738AbXE3Wgi (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2007 18:36:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:36:12 -0500 From: Matt Mackall To: David Miller Cc: kaber@trash.net, shemminger@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Make net watchdog timers 1 sec jiffy aligned Message-ID: <20070530223612.GR11115@waste.org> References: <465DC598.5060407@trash.net> <20070530.125551.41636333.davem@davemloft.net> <20070530221039.GJ11166@waste.org> <20070530.152939.21591222.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070530.152939.21591222.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 03:29:39PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Matt Mackall > Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:10:39 -0500 > > > Are you agreeing that "it seems wasteful to add per-packet overhead"? > > This patch is not doing that. > > Yes, and I know that :-) Is there a real reason for watchdog_timeo to be all over the map? -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.