* [PATCH] No I/O ports on the DECstation
@ 2007-05-29 14:08 Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-05-31 12:15 ` Ralf Baechle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maciej W. Rozycki @ 2007-05-29 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ralf Baechle; +Cc: linux-mips
There are no I/O ports on the DECstation whatsoever in any configuration
as neither the CPU nor the peripheral buses used have a concept of such.
Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
---
Please apply.
Maciej
patch-mips-2.6.21-20070502-dec-no_ioport-0
diff -up --recursive --new-file linux-mips-2.6.21-20070502.macro/arch/mips/Kconfig linux-mips-2.6.21-20070502/arch/mips/Kconfig
--- linux-mips-2.6.21-20070502.macro/arch/mips/Kconfig 2007-05-02 04:55:32.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-mips-2.6.21-20070502/arch/mips/Kconfig 2007-05-27 22:19:35.000000000 +0000
@@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ config MACH_DECSTATION
bool "DECstations"
select BOOT_ELF32
select DMA_NONCOHERENT
+ select NO_IOPORT
select SYS_HAS_EARLY_PRINTK
select IRQ_CPU
select SYS_HAS_CPU_R3000
@@ -943,6 +944,9 @@ config MIPS_NILE4
config MIPS_DISABLE_OBSOLETE_IDE
bool
+config NO_IOPORT
+ def_bool n
+
config GENERIC_ISA_DMA_SUPPORT_BROKEN
bool
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] No I/O ports on the DECstation
2007-05-29 14:08 [PATCH] No I/O ports on the DECstation Maciej W. Rozycki
@ 2007-05-31 12:15 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-05-31 13:21 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2007-05-31 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maciej W. Rozycki; +Cc: linux-mips
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 03:08:07PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> There are no I/O ports on the DECstation whatsoever in any configuration
> as neither the CPU nor the peripheral buses used have a concept of such.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
Stale patch?
Ralf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] No I/O ports on the DECstation
2007-05-31 12:15 ` Ralf Baechle
@ 2007-05-31 13:21 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-06-07 17:47 ` Ralf Baechle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maciej W. Rozycki @ 2007-05-31 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ralf Baechle; +Cc: linux-mips
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > There are no I/O ports on the DECstation whatsoever in any configuration
> > as neither the CPU nor the peripheral buses used have a concept of such.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
>
> Stale patch?
Not at all, it would seem. It applies just fine and is still required as
of 2.6.22-rc3. These CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM and CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT options are
pretty recent anyway -- there is little chance for anything about them to
get stale yet.
Maciej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] No I/O ports on the DECstation
2007-05-31 13:21 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
@ 2007-06-07 17:47 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-06-07 18:01 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2007-06-07 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maciej W. Rozycki; +Cc: linux-mips
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:21:11PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > Stale patch?
>
> Not at all, it would seem. It applies just fine and is still required as
> of 2.6.22-rc3. These CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM and CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT options are
> pretty recent anyway -- there is little chance for anything about them to
> get stale yet.
Git is pickier than patch. Anything that will still be applied by patch
with a fuzz will be rejected by git-apply. For good reason, I several
times ended with a corrupt tree thanks to patch happily (miss-)applying
some stale patch with fuzz. Heck, it hit akpm recently ...
Anyway, this one was trivial and is in my queue tree now.
Ralf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] No I/O ports on the DECstation
2007-06-07 17:47 ` Ralf Baechle
@ 2007-06-07 18:01 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maciej W. Rozycki @ 2007-06-07 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ralf Baechle; +Cc: linux-mips
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> Git is pickier than patch. Anything that will still be applied by patch
> with a fuzz will be rejected by git-apply. For good reason, I several
> times ended with a corrupt tree thanks to patch happily (miss-)applying
> some stale patch with fuzz. Heck, it hit akpm recently ...
I see -- I'll regenerate patches if they are fuzzy then. Thanks.
Maciej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-06-07 18:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-29 14:08 [PATCH] No I/O ports on the DECstation Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-05-31 12:15 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-05-31 13:21 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-06-07 17:47 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-06-07 18:01 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.