From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Hu5mx-0000jw-Eg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 07:59:27 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Hu5mv-0000d7-KO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 07:59:26 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hu5mv-0000cL-9g
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 07:59:25 -0400
Received: from phoenix.bawue.net ([193.7.176.60] helo=mail.bawue.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <ths@networkno.de>) id 1Hu5mu-00015w-S4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 07:59:25 -0400
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 12:59:22 +0100
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user semaphore structure mapping
Message-ID: <20070601115922.GI28232@networkno.de>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705292231350.6270@trantor.stuart.netsweng.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705292231350.6270@trantor.stuart.netsweng.com>
From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stuart Anderson <anderson@netsweng.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Stuart Anderson wrote:
> 
> This is a refresh (vs 5/28 cvs) of a patch sent several weeks ago. This
> patch implments the structure handling for the semaphore IPC related
> structures used by semctl().
> 
> This was tested using LTP on an ARM target.
> 
> Were there any objections to this patch?

It produces too many compiler warnings to be comfortable with, and
breaks compilation of alpha-linux-user.


Thiemo