From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762405AbXFBRrT (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 13:47:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761432AbXFBRrK (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 13:47:10 -0400 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:54588 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761092AbXFBRrJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 13:47:09 -0400 From: Len Brown Organization: Intel Open Source Technology Center To: Tear Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] IO-APIC blacklist Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 13:46:56 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: mingo@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <477357.96605.qm@web63602.mail.re1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <477357.96605.qm@web63602.mail.re1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706021346.57067.lenb@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > +static int __init disable_blacklisted_ioapic(struct dmi_system_id *d) > +{ > + printk(KERN_WARNING "%s detected... Disabling IO-APIC\n", d->ident); > + skip_ioapic_setup = 1; > + return(0); > +} Wouldn't this also disable the IOAPIC in the (working) ACPI+IOAPIC case?