From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH]: ACPI: preserve the ebx value in acpi_copy_wakeup_routine Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:37:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20070604103706.GA4405@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20070601101707.GC31453@elf.ucw.cz> <823A93EED437D048963A3697DB0E35DE16B6CB@pdsmsx414.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:40683 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752214AbXFDKhN (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 06:37:13 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <823A93EED437D048963A3697DB0E35DE16B6CB@pdsmsx414.ccr.corp.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Zhang, Rui" Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, "Tian, Kevin" Hi! > According to the SYSTEM V APPLICATION BINARY INTERFACE, > Intel386 Architecture: > "ecx and edx: Scratch registers have no specified role in the standard calling > sequence. Functions do not have to preserve their values for the > caller." Thanks for confirming. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html