From: Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@enter.net>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@jikos.cz>
Cc: Anand Jahagirdar <anandjigar@gmail.com>, Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
security@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kedar Sovani <kedar@dreamzgroup.com>
Subject: Re: Patch related with Fork Bombing Atack
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:28:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706041128.35321.dhazelton@enter.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706041652130.24237@twin.jikos.cz>
On Monday 04 June 2007 10:58:41 Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Anand Jahagirdar wrote:
> > I am forwarding one improved patch related with Fork Bombing
> > Attack. This patch prints a message (only once) which alerts
> > administrator/root user about fork bombing attack. I created this patch
> > to implement my idea of informing administrator about fork bombing
> > attack on his machine only once.
> > This patch overcomes all drawbacks of my previous patch related with
> > fork bombing attack and helps administrator. added comments will
> > definitely help developers.
> >
> > + /*
> > + * following code prints a message which alerts administrator/root *
> > user about fork bombing Attack + */
> > + if ((atomic_read(&p->user->processes) >=
> > (p->signal->rlim [RLIMIT_NPROC].rlim_cur - 1)) &&
> > (atomic_read(&p->user->processes) <
> > p->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_NPROC].rlim_cur)) {
>
> Did this get malformed somehow? Looks like some successive lines got
> pasted together, or something.
Seeing the lack of the '+' I think it's a mangling from not paying attention
to the 80 column marker in the editor.
> > + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) &&
> > p->user != &root_user) { + printk(KERN_CRIT"User with uid %d is
> > crossing its Process limit\n",p->user->uid); + }
> > + }
>
> Why not printk_ratelimit() here? Otherwise we have looped back to the
> possibility of user flooding the system logs, which has been already
> discussed in this thread, right?
>
> Also the { and } braces seem redundant.
They are.
Here's two hints:
1) double check for hidden "word wrap" problems. A sane programmers editor
will alert you to this, and careful checking of the patches before posting
will also reveal them. (emacs shows a \ in the 80th column, jed puts a $
there, etc...)
2) when there is a potential for syslog spam - like your patch has - use
printk_ratelimit() instead of printk(). This will throttle the output so that
flooding the syslog is no longer possible.
DRH
ps: you patch is very difficult to apply - try using git
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-04 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-31 13:45 Patch related with Fork Bombing Atack Anand Jahagirdar
2007-05-31 13:46 ` Jens Axboe
2007-06-01 6:48 ` Anand Jahagirdar
2007-06-01 7:25 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-06-01 7:30 ` Jens Axboe
2007-06-01 8:00 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-06-01 8:02 ` Jens Axboe
2007-06-03 23:01 ` Nix
2007-06-04 1:29 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-06-04 14:49 ` Anand Jahagirdar
2007-06-04 14:58 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-06-04 15:28 ` Daniel Hazelton [this message]
2007-06-05 14:20 ` Anand Jahagirdar
2007-06-01 8:38 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-06-01 14:29 ` Anand Jahagirdar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200706041128.35321.dhazelton@enter.net \
--to=dhazelton@enter.net \
--cc=anandjigar@gmail.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jikos@jikos.cz \
--cc=kedar@dreamzgroup.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.