From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
James Carter <jwcart2@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [bug] very high non-preempt latency in context_struct_compute_av()
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:17:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070604141718.GA29674@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Line.LNX.4.64.0706040924040.11109@d.namei>
* James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote:
> > the latency is caused by a _very_ long loop in the SELinux code:
> >
> > sshd-4828 0.N.. 465894us : avtab_search_node (context_struct_compute_av)
>
> What do the 0DNs fields mean and what did you use to create this
> trace?
i used the latency tracer from -rt. Here's the meaning of the fields:
_------=> CPU#
/ _-----=> irqs-off
| / _----=> need-resched
|| / _---=> hardirq/softirq
||| / _--=> preempt-depth
|||| /
||||| delay
cmd pid ||||| time | caller
\ / ||||| \ | /
trace-it-4751 0D... 0us : __next_cpu (user_trace_start)
it's very easy to interpret: it traces all the function calls the kernel
executes, and puts the symbolic function name (and its parent function)
into the trace, time ordered. So it's a proper execution trace. Normally
you can ignore the 'DN' type of flags - what matters in this case is the
observed 130 msecs latency and the functions that were called while that
latency happened.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-04 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-04 11:27 [bug] very high non-preempt latency in context_struct_compute_av() Ingo Molnar
2007-06-04 13:25 ` James Morris
2007-06-04 14:17 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-06-04 21:11 ` Paul Moore
2007-06-04 21:39 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-06-04 22:48 ` Paul Moore
2007-06-04 22:54 ` James Morris
2007-06-07 19:34 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-06-07 19:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-07 20:11 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070604141718.GA29674@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=jwcart2@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.