From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Subject: Re: 2.6.20.3 to be the next kernel? Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:17:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20070604181752.GG17323@redhat.com> References: <1180961068.5786.188.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200706041901.22519.mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Nate Carlson Cc: tim.post@netkinetics.net, Jeremy Fitzhardinge , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Mark Williamson , Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 01:13:01PM -0500, Nate Carlson wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Mark Williamson wrote: > >Not sure. A few interesting things are currently in progress with > >respect to kernel versions; the Xen paravirt-ops patches may be going > >into the next release mainline Linux (maybe? I think?) at which point > >you'll be able to build domU kernels directly from kernel.org sources. > > Just curious - can you also build dom0? :) No. AFAIK, at this point in time, Xen paravirt_ops is DomU only. Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|