All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Hanselmann <linux-kernel@hansmi.ch>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net,
	linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@killerfox.forkbomb.ch
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Fix NEC OHCI chip silicon bug
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 11:28:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070606092837.GA19712@hansmi.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0706051018360.3662-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>

On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:24:14AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> (Depending on which version of the kernel you are looking at -- [...]
> Earlier versions did behave the way you describe.)

I was looking at 2.6.22-rc3 which might explain the differences.

> So the system is behaving the way you want, but not for the reason you 
> think.  I bet you could remove the call to usb_root_hub_lost_power() 
> entirely and it wouldn't make any difference at all.

Actually, that's true. René Nussbaumer tried without that call and it
still works as intended. Should I leave that call out and drop the
changes on usb_root_hub_lost_power for CONFIG_PM?

Greets,
Michael

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-06  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-31 21:34 [PATCH] Fix NEC OHCI chip silicon bug Michael Hanselmann
2007-06-01 14:19 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Alan Stern
2007-06-02 12:40   ` Michael Hanselmann
2007-06-02 14:49     ` Alan Stern
2007-06-04 21:05       ` Michael Hanselmann
2007-06-05 14:24         ` Alan Stern
2007-06-06  9:28           ` Michael Hanselmann [this message]
2007-06-06 14:35             ` Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070606092837.GA19712@hansmi.ch \
    --to=linux-kernel@hansmi.ch \
    --cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@killerfox.forkbomb.ch \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.