From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.206]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HvtXy-0002qZ-Ee for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 07:19:29 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC] makedumpfile: xen extraction In-reply-to: <20070604122722.52E3.ODA@valinux.co.jp> Message-Id: <20070606201934oomichi@mail.jp.nec.com> References: <20070604122722.52E3.ODA@valinux.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 From: "Ken'ichi Ohmichi" Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 20:19:34 +0900 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Itsuro ODA Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org Hi Oda-san, 2007/06/04 13:01:44 +0900, Itsuro ODA wrote: >> Thank you for the xen patch, I'm interested in your patch. >> I'd like to separate the command of xen from the makedumpfile command, >> because the commandline usage should be simple and the binary file should >> be small in 2nd-kernel memory. Please let me know your opinion. > >I think separated command is possible option too. >How about to be "ifdef"ed the part of structures I added and >the main is sepatated ? > >BTW, >All pages used by the dom-0 are saved now. >Do you think it is better to be available to select pages like >makedumpfile from the dom-0 ? Yes, I do. It is a good idea. I think that it is better that the command for xen isn't separated from makedumpfile if unnecessary pages will be filtered out from dom-0, because the command for xen will need almost the same code. I'll start testing makedumpfile with your patch (2007/05/28) and inform you of the result. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec