All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	efault@gmx.de, kernel@kolivas.org, containers@lists.osdl.org,
	ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, pwil3058@bigpond.net.au,
	tingy@cs.umass.edu, tong.n.li@intel.com, wli@holomorphy.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com,
	balbir@in.ibm.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 3/6] core changes in CFS
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:23:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070611155345.GC2109@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070611154724.GA32435@in.ibm.com>

This patch introduces core changes in CFS work to operate on generic
schedulable entities. The task specific operations (like enqueue, dequeue, 
task_tick etc) is then rewritten to work off this generic CFS "library".

Signed-off-by : Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


---
 kernel/sched_debug.c |    2 
 kernel/sched_fair.c  |  574 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 2 files changed, 345 insertions(+), 231 deletions(-)

Index: current/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- current.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c	2007-06-09 15:07:16.000000000 +0530
+++ current/kernel/sched_fair.c	2007-06-09 15:07:33.000000000 +0530
@@ -42,19 +42,54 @@
 
 extern struct sched_class fair_sched_class;
 
+/******************************************************************************/
+/*            BEGIN : CFS operations on generic schedulable entities          */
+/******************************************************************************/
+
+static inline struct rq *lrq_rq(struct lrq *lrq)
+{
+	return container_of(lrq, struct rq, lrq);
+}
+
+static inline struct sched_entity *lrq_curr(struct lrq *lrq)
+{
+	struct rq *rq = lrq_rq(lrq);
+	struct sched_entity *se = NULL;
+
+	if (rq->curr->sched_class == &fair_sched_class)
+		se = &rq->curr->se;
+
+	return se;
+}
+
+static long lrq_nr_running(struct lrq *lrq)
+{
+	struct rq *rq = lrq_rq(lrq);
+
+	return rq->nr_running;
+}
+
+#define entity_is_task(se)	1
+
+static inline struct task_struct *entity_to_task(struct sched_entity *se)
+{
+	return container_of(se, struct task_struct, se);
+}
+
+
 /**************************************************************/
 /* Scheduling class tree data structure manipulation methods:
  */
 
 /*
- * Enqueue a task into the rb-tree:
+ * Enqueue a entity into the rb-tree:
  */
-static inline void __enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+static inline void __enqueue_entity(struct lrq *lrq, struct sched_entity *p)
 {
-	struct rb_node **link = &rq->lrq.tasks_timeline.rb_node;
+	struct rb_node **link = &lrq->tasks_timeline.rb_node;
 	struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
-	struct task_struct *entry;
-	s64 key = p->se.fair_key;
+	struct sched_entity *entry;
+	s64 key = p->fair_key;
 	int leftmost = 1;
 
 	/*
@@ -62,12 +97,12 @@
 	 */
 	while (*link) {
 		parent = *link;
-		entry = rb_entry(parent, struct task_struct, se.run_node);
+		entry = rb_entry(parent, struct sched_entity, run_node);
 		/*
 		 * We dont care about collisions. Nodes with
 		 * the same key stay together.
 		 */
-		if ((s64)(key - entry->se.fair_key) < 0) {
+		if ((s64)(key - entry->fair_key) < 0) {
 			link = &parent->rb_left;
 		} else {
 			link = &parent->rb_right;
@@ -80,31 +115,31 @@
 	 * used):
 	 */
 	if (leftmost)
-		rq->lrq.rb_leftmost = &p->se.run_node;
+		lrq->rb_leftmost = &p->run_node;
 
-	rb_link_node(&p->se.run_node, parent, link);
-	rb_insert_color(&p->se.run_node, &rq->lrq.tasks_timeline);
+	rb_link_node(&p->run_node, parent, link);
+	rb_insert_color(&p->run_node, &lrq->tasks_timeline);
 }
 
-static inline void __dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+static inline void __dequeue_entity(struct lrq *lrq, struct sched_entity *p)
 {
-	if (rq->lrq.rb_leftmost == &p->se.run_node)
-		rq->lrq.rb_leftmost = NULL;
-	rb_erase(&p->se.run_node, &rq->lrq.tasks_timeline);
+	if (lrq->rb_leftmost == &p->run_node)
+		lrq->rb_leftmost = NULL;
+	rb_erase(&p->run_node, &lrq->tasks_timeline);
 }
 
-static inline struct rb_node * first_fair(struct rq *rq)
+static inline struct rb_node * first_fair(struct lrq *lrq)
 {
-	if (rq->lrq.rb_leftmost)
-		return rq->lrq.rb_leftmost;
+	if (lrq->rb_leftmost)
+		return lrq->rb_leftmost;
 	/* Cache the value returned by rb_first() */
-	rq->lrq.rb_leftmost = rb_first(&rq->lrq.tasks_timeline);
-	return rq->lrq.rb_leftmost;
+	lrq->rb_leftmost = rb_first(&lrq->tasks_timeline);
+	return lrq->rb_leftmost;
 }
 
-static struct task_struct * __pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq)
+static struct sched_entity * __pick_next_entity(struct lrq *lrq)
 {
-	return rb_entry(first_fair(rq), struct task_struct, se.run_node);
+	return rb_entry(first_fair(lrq), struct sched_entity, run_node);
 }
 
 /**************************************************************/
@@ -116,21 +151,21 @@
  * nice level, but only linearly, not exponentially:
  */
 static u64
-niced_granularity(struct task_struct *curr, unsigned long granularity)
+niced_granularity(struct sched_entity *curr, unsigned long granularity)
 {
 	/*
 	 * Negative nice levels get the same granularity as nice-0:
 	 */
-	if (curr->se.load_weight >= NICE_0_LOAD)
+	if (curr->load_weight >= NICE_0_LOAD)
 		return granularity;
 	/*
 	 * Positive nice level tasks get linearly finer
 	 * granularity:
 	 */
-	return curr->se.load_weight * (s64)(granularity / NICE_0_LOAD);
+	return curr->load_weight * (s64)(granularity / NICE_0_LOAD);
 }
 
-static void limit_wait_runtime(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+static void limit_wait_runtime(struct lrq *lrq, struct sched_entity *p)
 {
 	s64 limit = sysctl_sched_runtime_limit;
 
@@ -138,30 +173,31 @@
 	 * Niced tasks have the same history dynamic range as
 	 * non-niced tasks:
 	 */
-	if (p->se.wait_runtime > limit) {
-		p->se.wait_runtime = limit;
-		p->se.wait_runtime_overruns++;
-		rq->lrq.wait_runtime_overruns++;
-	}
-	if (p->se.wait_runtime < -limit) {
-		p->se.wait_runtime = -limit;
-		p->se.wait_runtime_underruns++;
-		rq->lrq.wait_runtime_underruns++;
+	if (p->wait_runtime > limit) {
+		p->wait_runtime = limit;
+		p->wait_runtime_overruns++;
+		lrq->wait_runtime_overruns++;
+	}
+	if (p->wait_runtime < -limit) {
+		p->wait_runtime = -limit;
+		p->wait_runtime_underruns++;
+		lrq->wait_runtime_underruns++;
 	}
 }
 
-static void __add_wait_runtime(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, s64 delta)
+static void
+__add_wait_runtime(struct lrq *lrq, struct sched_entity *p, s64 delta)
 {
-	p->se.wait_runtime += delta;
-	p->se.sum_wait_runtime += delta;
-	limit_wait_runtime(rq, p);
+	p->wait_runtime += delta;
+	p->sum_wait_runtime += delta;
+	limit_wait_runtime(lrq, p);
 }
 
-static void add_wait_runtime(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, s64 delta)
+static void add_wait_runtime(struct lrq *lrq, struct sched_entity *p, s64 delta)
 {
-	rq->lrq.wait_runtime -= p->se.wait_runtime;
-	__add_wait_runtime(rq, p, delta);
-	rq->lrq.wait_runtime += p->se.wait_runtime;
+	lrq->wait_runtime -= p->wait_runtime;
+	__add_wait_runtime(lrq, p, delta);
+	lrq->wait_runtime += p->wait_runtime;
 }
 
 static s64 div64_s(s64 divident, unsigned long divisor)
@@ -183,49 +219,51 @@
  * Update the current task's runtime statistics. Skip current tasks that
  * are not in our scheduling class.
  */
-static inline void update_curr(struct rq *rq, u64 now)
+static inline void update_curr(struct lrq *lrq, u64 now)
 {
-	unsigned long load = rq->lrq.raw_weighted_load;
+	unsigned long load = lrq->raw_weighted_load;
 	u64 delta_exec, delta_fair, delta_mine;
-	struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr;
+	struct sched_entity *curr = lrq_curr(lrq);
+	struct rq *rq = lrq_rq(lrq);
+	struct task_struct *curtask = rq->curr;
 
-	if (curr->sched_class != &fair_sched_class || curr == rq->idle || !load)
+	if (!curr || curtask == rq->idle || !load)
 		return;
 	/*
 	 * Get the amount of time the current task was running
 	 * since the last time we changed raw_weighted_load:
 	 */
-	delta_exec = now - curr->se.exec_start;
+	delta_exec = now - curr->exec_start;
 	if (unlikely((s64)delta_exec < 0))
 		delta_exec = 0;
-	if (unlikely(delta_exec > curr->se.exec_max))
-		curr->se.exec_max = delta_exec;
+	if (unlikely(delta_exec > curr->exec_max))
+		curr->exec_max = delta_exec;
 
-	curr->se.sum_exec_runtime += delta_exec;
-	curr->se.exec_start = now;
-	rq->lrq.exec_clock += delta_exec;
+	curr->sum_exec_runtime += delta_exec;
+	curr->exec_start = now;
+	lrq->exec_clock += delta_exec;
 
 	delta_fair = delta_exec * NICE_0_LOAD;
 	delta_fair += load >> 1; /* rounding */
 	do_div(delta_fair, load);
 
 	/* Load-balancing accounting. */
-	rq->lrq.delta_fair_clock += delta_fair;
-	rq->lrq.delta_exec_clock += delta_exec;
+	lrq->delta_fair_clock += delta_fair;
+	lrq->delta_exec_clock += delta_exec;
 
 	/*
 	 * Task already marked for preemption, do not burden
 	 * it with the cost of not having left the CPU yet:
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(sysctl_sched_features & 1))
-		if (unlikely(test_tsk_thread_flag(curr, TIF_NEED_RESCHED)))
+		if (unlikely(test_tsk_thread_flag(curtask, TIF_NEED_RESCHED)))
 			return;
 
-	delta_mine = delta_exec * curr->se.load_weight;
+	delta_mine = delta_exec * curr->load_weight;
 	delta_mine += load >> 1; /* rounding */
 	do_div(delta_mine, load);
 
-	rq->lrq.fair_clock += delta_fair;
+	lrq->fair_clock += delta_fair;
 	/*
 	 * We executed delta_exec amount of time on the CPU,
 	 * but we were only entitled to delta_mine amount of
@@ -233,21 +271,21 @@
 	 * the two values are equal)
 	 * [Note: delta_mine - delta_exec is negative]:
 	 */
-	add_wait_runtime(rq, curr, delta_mine - delta_exec);
+	add_wait_runtime(lrq, curr, delta_mine - delta_exec);
 }
 
 static inline void
-update_stats_wait_start(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 now)
+update_stats_wait_start(struct lrq *lrq, struct sched_entity *p, u64 now)
 {
-	p->se.wait_start_fair = rq->lrq.fair_clock;
-	p->se.wait_start = now;
+	p->wait_start_fair = lrq->fair_clock;
+	p->wait_start = now;
 }
 
 /*
  * Task is being enqueued - update stats:
  */
 static inline void
-update_stats_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 now)
+update_stats_enqueue(struct lrq *lrq, struct sched_entity *p, u64 now)
 {
 	s64 key;
 
@@ -255,86 +293,86 @@
 	 * Are we enqueueing a waiting task? (for current tasks
 	 * a dequeue/enqueue event is a NOP)
 	 */
-	if (p != rq->curr)
-		update_stats_wait_start(rq, p, now);
+	if (p != lrq_curr(lrq))
+		update_stats_wait_start(lrq, p, now);
 	/*
 	 * Update the key:
 	 */
-	key = rq->lrq.fair_clock;
+	key = lrq->fair_clock;
 
 	/*
 	 * Optimize the common nice 0 case:
 	 */
-	if (likely(p->se.load_weight == NICE_0_LOAD))
-		key -= p->se.wait_runtime;
+	if (likely(p->load_weight == NICE_0_LOAD))
+		key -= p->wait_runtime;
 	else {
-		if (p->se.wait_runtime < 0)
-			key -= div64_s(p->se.wait_runtime * NICE_0_LOAD,
-							 p->se.load_weight);
+		if (p->wait_runtime < 0)
+			key -= div64_s(p->wait_runtime * NICE_0_LOAD,
+							 p->load_weight);
 		else
-			key -= div64_s(p->se.wait_runtime * p->se.load_weight,
+			key -= div64_s(p->wait_runtime * p->load_weight,
 							 	NICE_0_LOAD);
 	}
 
-	p->se.fair_key = key;
+	p->fair_key = key;
 }
 
 /*
  * Note: must be called with a freshly updated rq->fair_clock.
  */
 static inline void
-update_stats_wait_end(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 now)
+update_stats_wait_end(struct lrq *lrq, struct sched_entity *p, u64 now)
 {
 	s64 delta_fair, delta_wait;
 
-	delta_wait = now - p->se.wait_start;
-	if (unlikely(delta_wait > p->se.wait_max))
-		p->se.wait_max = delta_wait;
+	delta_wait = now - p->wait_start;
+	if (unlikely(delta_wait > p->wait_max))
+		p->wait_max = delta_wait;
 
-	if (p->se.wait_start_fair) {
-		delta_fair = rq->lrq.fair_clock - p->se.wait_start_fair;
+	if (p->wait_start_fair) {
+		delta_fair = lrq->fair_clock - p->wait_start_fair;
 
-		if (unlikely(p->se.load_weight != NICE_0_LOAD))
-			delta_fair = div64_s(delta_fair * p->se.load_weight,
+		if (unlikely(p->load_weight != NICE_0_LOAD))
+			delta_fair = div64_s(delta_fair * p->load_weight,
 								NICE_0_LOAD);
-		add_wait_runtime(rq, p, delta_fair);
+		add_wait_runtime(lrq, p, delta_fair);
 	}
 
-	p->se.wait_start_fair = 0;
-	p->se.wait_start = 0;
+	p->wait_start_fair = 0;
+	p->wait_start = 0;
 }
 
 static inline void
-update_stats_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 now)
+update_stats_dequeue(struct lrq *lrq, struct sched_entity *p, u64 now)
 {
-	update_curr(rq, now);
+	update_curr(lrq, now);
 	/*
 	 * Mark the end of the wait period if dequeueing a
 	 * waiting task:
 	 */
-	if (p != rq->curr)
-		update_stats_wait_end(rq, p, now);
+	if (p != lrq_curr(lrq))
+		update_stats_wait_end(lrq, p, now);
 }
 
 /*
  * We are picking a new current task - update its stats:
  */
 static inline void
-update_stats_curr_start(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 now)
+update_stats_curr_start(struct lrq *lrq, struct sched_entity *p, u64 now)
 {
 	/*
 	 * We are starting a new run period:
 	 */
-	p->se.exec_start = now;
+	p->exec_start = now;
 }
 
 /*
  * We are descheduling a task - update its stats:
  */
 static inline void
-update_stats_curr_end(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 now)
+update_stats_curr_end(struct lrq *lrq, struct sched_entity *p, u64 now)
 {
-	p->se.exec_start = 0;
+	p->exec_start = 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -347,39 +385,41 @@
  * manner we move the fair clock back by a proportional
  * amount of the new wait_runtime this task adds to the pool.
  */
-static void distribute_fair_add(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
+static void distribute_fair_add(struct lrq *lrq, s64 delta)
 {
-	struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr;
+	struct sched_entity *curr = lrq_curr(lrq);
 	s64 delta_fair = 0;
 
 	if (!(sysctl_sched_features & 2))
 		return;
 
-	if (rq->nr_running) {
-		delta_fair = div64_s(delta, rq->nr_running);
+	if (lrq_nr_running(lrq)) {
+		delta_fair = div64_s(delta, lrq_nr_running(lrq));
 		/*
 		 * The currently running task's next wait_runtime value does
 		 * not depend on the fair_clock, so fix it up explicitly:
 		 */
-		 if (curr->sched_class == &fair_sched_class)
-			add_wait_runtime(rq, curr, -delta_fair);
+		 if (curr)
+			add_wait_runtime(lrq, curr, -delta_fair);
 	}
-	rq->lrq.fair_clock -= delta_fair;
+	lrq->fair_clock -= delta_fair;
 }
 
 /**************************************************************/
 /* Scheduling class queueing methods:
  */
 
-static void enqueue_sleeper(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+static void enqueue_sleeper(struct lrq *lrq, struct sched_entity *p)
 {
-	unsigned long load = rq->lrq.raw_weighted_load;
+	unsigned long load = lrq->raw_weighted_load;
 	s64 delta_fair, prev_runtime;
+	struct task_struct *tsk = entity_to_task(p);
 
-	if (p->policy == SCHED_BATCH || !(sysctl_sched_features & 4))
+	if ((entity_is_task(p) && tsk->policy == SCHED_BATCH) ||
+						 !(sysctl_sched_features & 4))
 		goto out;
 
-	delta_fair = rq->lrq.fair_clock - p->se.sleep_start_fair;
+	delta_fair = lrq->fair_clock - p->sleep_start_fair;
 
 	/*
 	 * Fix up delta_fair with the effect of us running
@@ -387,69 +427,206 @@
 	 */
 	if (!(sysctl_sched_features & 32))
 		delta_fair = div64_s(delta_fair * load,
-						 load + p->se.load_weight);
-	delta_fair = div64_s(delta_fair * p->se.load_weight, NICE_0_LOAD);
+						 load + p->load_weight);
+	delta_fair = div64_s(delta_fair * p->load_weight, NICE_0_LOAD);
 
-	prev_runtime = p->se.wait_runtime;
-	__add_wait_runtime(rq, p, delta_fair);
-	delta_fair = p->se.wait_runtime - prev_runtime;
+	prev_runtime = p->wait_runtime;
+	__add_wait_runtime(lrq, p, delta_fair);
+	delta_fair = p->wait_runtime - prev_runtime;
 
 	/*
 	 * We move the fair clock back by a load-proportional
 	 * amount of the new wait_runtime this task adds to
 	 * the 'pool':
 	 */
-	distribute_fair_add(rq, delta_fair);
+	distribute_fair_add(lrq, delta_fair);
 
 out:
-	rq->lrq.wait_runtime += p->se.wait_runtime;
+	lrq->wait_runtime += p->wait_runtime;
 
-	p->se.sleep_start_fair = 0;
+	p->sleep_start_fair = 0;
 }
 
-/*
- * The enqueue_task method is called before nr_running is
- * increased. Here we update the fair scheduling stats and
- * then put the task into the rbtree:
- */
 static void
-enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup, u64 now)
+enqueue_entity(struct lrq *lrq, struct sched_entity *p, int wakeup, u64 now)
 {
 	u64 delta = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Update the fair clock.
 	 */
-	update_curr(rq, now);
+	update_curr(lrq, now);
 
 	if (wakeup) {
-		if (p->se.sleep_start) {
-			delta = now - p->se.sleep_start;
+		if (p->sleep_start) {
+			delta = now - p->sleep_start;
 			if ((s64)delta < 0)
 				delta = 0;
 
-			if (unlikely(delta > p->se.sleep_max))
-				p->se.sleep_max = delta;
+			if (unlikely(delta > p->sleep_max))
+				p->sleep_max = delta;
 
-			p->se.sleep_start = 0;
+			p->sleep_start = 0;
 		}
-		if (p->se.block_start) {
-			delta = now - p->se.block_start;
+		if (p->block_start) {
+			delta = now - p->block_start;
 			if ((s64)delta < 0)
 				delta = 0;
 
-			if (unlikely(delta > p->se.block_max))
-				p->se.block_max = delta;
+			if (unlikely(delta > p->block_max))
+				p->block_max = delta;
 
-			p->se.block_start = 0;
+			p->block_start = 0;
 		}
-		p->se.sum_sleep_runtime += delta;
+		p->sum_sleep_runtime += delta;
 
-		if (p->se.sleep_start_fair)
-			enqueue_sleeper(rq, p);
+		if (p->sleep_start_fair)
+			enqueue_sleeper(lrq, p);
 	}
-	update_stats_enqueue(rq, p, now);
-	__enqueue_task_fair(rq, p);
+	update_stats_enqueue(lrq, p, now);
+	__enqueue_entity(lrq, p);
+}
+
+static void
+dequeue_entity(struct lrq *lrq, struct sched_entity *p, int sleep, u64 now)
+{
+	update_stats_dequeue(lrq, p, now);
+	if (sleep) {
+		if (entity_is_task(p)) {
+			struct task_struct *tsk = entity_to_task(p);
+
+			if (tsk->state & TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
+				p->sleep_start = now;
+			if (tsk->state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
+				p->block_start = now;
+		}
+		p->sleep_start_fair = lrq->fair_clock;
+		lrq->wait_runtime -= p->wait_runtime;
+	}
+	__dequeue_entity(lrq, p);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Preempt the current task with a newly woken task if needed:
+ */
+static inline void
+__check_preempt_curr_fair(struct lrq *lrq, struct sched_entity *p,
+			  struct sched_entity *curr, unsigned long granularity)
+{
+	s64 __delta = curr->fair_key - p->fair_key;
+
+	/*
+	 * Take scheduling granularity into account - do not
+	 * preempt the current task unless the best task has
+	 * a larger than sched_granularity fairness advantage:
+	 */
+	if (__delta > niced_granularity(curr, granularity))
+		resched_task(lrq_rq(lrq)->curr);
+}
+
+static struct sched_entity * pick_next_entity(struct lrq *lrq, u64 now)
+{
+	struct sched_entity *p = __pick_next_entity(lrq);
+
+	/*
+	 * Any task has to be enqueued before it get to execute on
+	 * a CPU. So account for the time it spent waiting on the
+	 * runqueue. (note, here we rely on pick_next_task() having
+	 * done a put_prev_task_fair() shortly before this, which
+	 * updated rq->fair_clock - used by update_stats_wait_end())
+	 */
+	update_stats_wait_end(lrq, p, now);
+	update_stats_curr_start(lrq, p, now);
+
+	return p;
+}
+
+static void put_prev_entity(struct lrq *lrq, struct sched_entity *prev, u64 now)
+{
+	/*
+	 * If the task is still waiting for the CPU (it just got
+	 * preempted), update its position within the tree and
+	 * start the wait period:
+	 */
+	if ((sysctl_sched_features & 16) && entity_is_task(prev))  {
+		struct task_struct *prevtask = entity_to_task(prev);
+
+		if (prev->on_rq &&
+			test_tsk_thread_flag(prevtask, TIF_NEED_RESCHED)) {
+
+			dequeue_entity(lrq, prev, 0, now);
+			prev->on_rq = 0;
+			enqueue_entity(lrq, prev, 0, now);
+			prev->on_rq = 1;
+		} else
+			update_curr(lrq, now);
+	} else {
+		update_curr(lrq, now);
+	}
+
+	update_stats_curr_end(lrq, prev, now);
+
+	if (prev->on_rq)
+		update_stats_wait_start(lrq, prev, now);
+}
+
+static void entity_tick(struct lrq *lrq, struct sched_entity *curr)
+{
+	struct sched_entity *next;
+	struct rq *rq = lrq_rq(lrq);
+	u64 now = __rq_clock(rq);
+
+	/*
+	 * Dequeue and enqueue the task to update its
+	 * position within the tree:
+	 */
+	dequeue_entity(lrq, curr, 0, now);
+	curr->on_rq = 0;
+	enqueue_entity(lrq, curr, 0, now);
+	curr->on_rq = 1;
+
+	/*
+	 * Reschedule if another task tops the current one.
+	 */
+	next = __pick_next_entity(lrq);
+	if (next == curr)
+		return;
+
+	if (entity_is_task(curr)) {
+		struct task_struct *curtask = entity_to_task(curr),
+				   *nexttask = entity_to_task(next);
+
+		if ((curtask == rq->idle) || (rt_prio(nexttask->prio) &&
+					(nexttask->prio < curtask->prio))) {
+			resched_task(curtask);
+			return;
+		}
+	}
+	__check_preempt_curr_fair(lrq, next, curr, sysctl_sched_granularity);
+}
+
+
+/******************************************************************************/
+/*                         BEGIN : CFS operations on tasks                    */
+/******************************************************************************/
+
+static inline struct lrq *task_lrq(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	return &task_rq(p)->lrq;
+}
+
+/*
+ * The enqueue_task method is called before nr_running is
+ * increased. Here we update the fair scheduling stats and
+ * then put the task into the rbtree:
+ */
+static void
+enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup, u64 now)
+{
+	struct lrq *lrq = task_lrq(p);
+	struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
+
+	enqueue_entity(lrq, se, wakeup, now);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -460,16 +637,10 @@
 static void
 dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep, u64 now)
 {
-	update_stats_dequeue(rq, p, now);
-	if (sleep) {
-		if (p->state & TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
-			p->se.sleep_start = now;
-		if (p->state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
-			p->se.block_start = now;
-		p->se.sleep_start_fair = rq->lrq.fair_clock;
-		rq->lrq.wait_runtime -= p->se.wait_runtime;
-	}
-	__dequeue_task_fair(rq, p);
+	struct lrq *lrq = task_lrq(p);
+	struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
+
+	dequeue_entity(lrq, se, sleep, now);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -482,16 +653,18 @@
 {
 	struct task_struct *p_next;
 	u64 now;
+	struct lrq *lrq = task_lrq(p);
+	struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
 
 	now = __rq_clock(rq);
 	/*
 	 * Dequeue and enqueue the task to update its
 	 * position within the tree:
 	 */
-	dequeue_task_fair(rq, p, 0, now);
-	p->se.on_rq = 0;
-	enqueue_task_fair(rq, p, 0, now);
-	p->se.on_rq = 1;
+	dequeue_entity(lrq, se, 0, now);
+	se->on_rq = 0;
+	enqueue_entity(lrq, se, 0, now);
+	se->on_rq = 1;
 
 	/*
 	 * yield-to support: if we are on the same runqueue then
@@ -503,35 +676,19 @@
 
 		s64 delta = p->se.wait_runtime >> 1;
 
-		__add_wait_runtime(rq, p_to, delta);
-		__add_wait_runtime(rq, p, -delta);
+		__add_wait_runtime(lrq, &p_to->se, delta);
+		__add_wait_runtime(lrq, &p->se, -delta);
 	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Reschedule if another task tops the current one.
 	 */
-	p_next = __pick_next_task_fair(rq);
+	se = __pick_next_entity(lrq);
+	p_next = entity_to_task(se);
 	if (p_next != p)
 		resched_task(p);
 }
 
-/*
- * Preempt the current task with a newly woken task if needed:
- */
-static inline void
-__check_preempt_curr_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
-			  struct task_struct *curr, unsigned long granularity)
-{
-	s64 __delta = curr->se.fair_key - p->se.fair_key;
-
-	/*
-	 * Take scheduling granularity into account - do not
-	 * preempt the current task unless the best task has
-	 * a larger than sched_granularity fairness advantage:
-	 */
-	if (__delta > niced_granularity(curr, granularity))
-		resched_task(curr);
-}
 
 /*
  * Preempt the current task with a newly woken task if needed:
@@ -539,12 +696,13 @@
 static void check_preempt_curr_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr;
+	struct lrq *lrq = task_lrq(curr);
 	unsigned long granularity;
 
 	if ((curr == rq->idle) || rt_prio(p->prio)) {
 		if (sysctl_sched_features & 8) {
 			if (rt_prio(p->prio))
-				update_curr(rq, rq_clock(rq));
+				update_curr(lrq, rq_clock(rq));
 		}
 		resched_task(curr);
 	} else {
@@ -555,25 +713,18 @@
 		if (unlikely(p->policy == SCHED_BATCH))
 			granularity = sysctl_sched_batch_wakeup_granularity;
 
-		__check_preempt_curr_fair(rq, p, curr, granularity);
+		__check_preempt_curr_fair(lrq, &p->se, &curr->se, granularity);
 	}
 }
 
 static struct task_struct * pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, u64 now)
 {
-	struct task_struct *p = __pick_next_task_fair(rq);
+	struct lrq *lrq = &rq->lrq;
+	struct sched_entity *se;
 
-	/*
-	 * Any task has to be enqueued before it get to execute on
-	 * a CPU. So account for the time it spent waiting on the
-	 * runqueue. (note, here we rely on pick_next_task() having
-	 * done a put_prev_task_fair() shortly before this, which
-	 * updated rq->fair_clock - used by update_stats_wait_end())
-	 */
-	update_stats_wait_end(rq, p, now);
-	update_stats_curr_start(rq, p, now);
+	se = pick_next_entity(lrq, now);
 
-	return p;
+	return entity_to_task(se);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -581,32 +732,13 @@
  */
 static void put_prev_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, u64 now)
 {
+	struct lrq *lrq = task_lrq(prev);
+	struct sched_entity *se = &prev->se;
+
 	if (prev == rq->idle)
 		return;
 
-	/*
-	 * If the task is still waiting for the CPU (it just got
-	 * preempted), update its position within the tree and
-	 * start the wait period:
-	 */
-	if (sysctl_sched_features & 16)  {
-		if (prev->se.on_rq &&
-			test_tsk_thread_flag(prev, TIF_NEED_RESCHED)) {
-
-			dequeue_task_fair(rq, prev, 0, now);
-			prev->se.on_rq = 0;
-			enqueue_task_fair(rq, prev, 0, now);
-			prev->se.on_rq = 1;
-		} else
-			update_curr(rq, now);
-	} else {
-		update_curr(rq, now);
-	}
-
-	update_stats_curr_end(rq, prev, now);
-
-	if (prev->se.on_rq)
-		update_stats_wait_start(rq, prev, now);
+	put_prev_entity(lrq, se, now);
 }
 
 /**************************************************************/
@@ -636,7 +768,7 @@
 
 static struct task_struct * load_balance_start_fair(struct rq *rq)
 {
-	return __load_balance_iterator(rq, first_fair(rq));
+	return __load_balance_iterator(rq, first_fair(&rq->lrq));
 }
 
 static struct task_struct * load_balance_next_fair(struct rq *rq)
@@ -649,31 +781,10 @@
  */
 static void task_tick_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
 {
-	struct task_struct *next;
-	u64 now = __rq_clock(rq);
-
-	/*
-	 * Dequeue and enqueue the task to update its
-	 * position within the tree:
-	 */
-	dequeue_task_fair(rq, curr, 0, now);
-	curr->se.on_rq = 0;
-	enqueue_task_fair(rq, curr, 0, now);
-	curr->se.on_rq = 1;
-
-	/*
-	 * Reschedule if another task tops the current one.
-	 */
-	next = __pick_next_task_fair(rq);
-	if (next == curr)
-		return;
+	struct lrq *lrq = task_lrq(curr);
+	struct sched_entity *se = &curr->se;
 
-	if ((curr == rq->idle) || (rt_prio(next->prio) &&
-					(next->prio < curr->prio)))
-		resched_task(curr);
-	else
-		__check_preempt_curr_fair(rq, next, curr,
-					  sysctl_sched_granularity);
+	entity_tick(lrq, se);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -685,14 +796,17 @@
  */
 static void task_new_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 {
+	struct lrq *lrq = task_lrq(p);
+	struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
+
 	sched_info_queued(p);
-	update_stats_enqueue(rq, p, rq_clock(rq));
+	update_stats_enqueue(lrq, se, rq_clock(rq));
 	/*
 	 * Child runs first: we let it run before the parent
 	 * until it reschedules once. We set up the key so that
 	 * it will preempt the parent:
 	 */
-	p->se.fair_key = current->se.fair_key - niced_granularity(rq->curr,
+	p->se.fair_key = current->se.fair_key - niced_granularity(&rq->curr->se,
 						sysctl_sched_granularity) - 1;
 	/*
 	 * The first wait is dominated by the child-runs-first logic,
@@ -706,7 +820,7 @@
 	 */
 //	p->se.wait_runtime = -(s64)(sysctl_sched_granularity / 2);
 
-	__enqueue_task_fair(rq, p);
+	__enqueue_entity(lrq, se);
 	p->se.on_rq = 1;
 	inc_nr_running(p, rq);
 }
Index: current/kernel/sched_debug.c
===================================================================
--- current.orig/kernel/sched_debug.c	2007-06-09 15:07:16.000000000 +0530
+++ current/kernel/sched_debug.c	2007-06-09 15:07:33.000000000 +0530
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
-	curr = first_fair(rq);
+	curr = first_fair(&rq->lrq);
 	while (curr) {
 		p = rb_entry(curr, struct task_struct, se.run_node);
 		wait_runtime_rq_sum += p->se.wait_runtime;
-- 
Regards,
vatsa

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-11 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-11 15:47 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1 Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-11 15:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] Introduce struct sched_entity and struct lrq Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-11 18:48   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-11 18:56     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-12  2:15   ` [ckrm-tech] " Balbir Singh
2007-06-12  3:52     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-11 15:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] task's cpu information needs to be always correct Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-12  2:17   ` [ckrm-tech] " Balbir Singh
2007-06-11 15:53 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2007-06-12  2:29   ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] core changes in CFS Balbir Singh
2007-06-12  4:22     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-11 15:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] Fix (bad?) interactions between SCHED_RT and SCHED_NORMAL tasks Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-12  9:03   ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-06-12 10:26     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-12 12:23       ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-06-12 13:30         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-12 14:31           ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-06-12 15:43             ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-11 15:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] core changes for group fairness Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-13 20:56   ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-06-14 12:06     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-11 15:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] Hook up to container infrastructure Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-11 16:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1 Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-11 19:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-11 19:39   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-12  5:50   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-12  6:26     ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found]       ` <20070612072742.GA785@in.ibm.com>
2007-06-12 10:56         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-15 12:46       ` Kirill Korotaev
2007-06-15 14:06         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070611155345.GC2109@in.ibm.com \
    --to=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
    --cc=tingy@cs.umass.edu \
    --cc=tong.n.li@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.