All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu <maxdamage@aladin.ro>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] UML: fix missing non-blocking I/O, now DEBUG_SHIRQ works
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:16:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070611211604.GA8859@c2.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <466DA50C.5050301@aladin.ro>

On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 10:39:56PM +0300, Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> No offense, but this is an ugly hack. 

I'm not going to defend it too much, but the alternatives don't seem any
better to me.

> What if sizeof(int) !=  sizeof(long)?

Doesn't matter - the casting will preserve the value.  Of greater
concern is the relationship between sizeof(void *) and sizeof(long).
That's not guaranteed by the standard, but is by gcc.

> You're calling glibc functions
> with that fd as a parameter. On some arches, compiling will issue
> warnings or simply fail. 

Which ones?

> An alternative would be to use kmalloc instead of a global static 
> variable. Do you like this one more?

No, that trades the global variable for a new point of failure.

The main reason I like the current casting better than your global
(not by a lot) is that globals have to be audited for SMP safety.  So,
I don't want any globals which don't need to be.  This implies a
local, and to minimize the machinery associated with that (kmalloc, or
passing a pointer and synchronizing to avoid returning too soon), just
passing the descriptor in the pointer and accepting the casting needed
to get it through the compiler.

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-11 21:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-10 22:01 [PATCH 1/1] UML: fix missing non-blocking I/O, now DEBUG_SHIRQ works Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu
2007-06-11 17:31 ` Jeff Dike
2007-06-11 19:39   ` Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu
2007-06-11 21:16     ` Jeff Dike [this message]
2007-06-11 22:39       ` Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu
2007-06-12  0:48         ` Jeff Dike
2007-06-12  5:44           ` Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu
2007-06-12 13:26             ` Jeff Dike
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-10 22:20 Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu
2007-06-11 10:26 ` Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070611211604.GA8859@c2.user-mode-linux.org \
    --to=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxdamage@aladin.ro \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.