From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: George Hadjichristofi <gh@winlab.rutgers.edu>
Cc: 'shruti singhal' <shruti20@gmail.com>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] UDP vs. TCP performance over UML
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:04:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070612150405.GA7102@c2.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <010701c7ace0$f98b0d80$d8c8a8c0@angel4>
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 07:01:05AM -0400, George Hadjichristofi wrote:
> When we use TCP the throughput is 100 Mbps from the UML instance of node A
> to the host kernel of node B and 100 Mbps from the host kernel of node A to
> the host kernel of node B. However, when we use UDP the throughput is only
> 26 Mbps from the UML instance on node A to the host kernel of node B, but
> 100 Mbps from the host kernel of node A to the host kernel of node B. We
> also notice that a large number of packets were dropped in the case of UDP
> over UML.
At what interface are the packets being dropped?
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-12 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-12 11:01 [uml-devel] UDP vs. TCP performance over UML George Hadjichristofi
2007-06-12 15:04 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
2007-06-13 0:32 ` George Hadjichristofi
2007-06-13 1:24 ` Jeff Dike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070612150405.GA7102@c2.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=gh@winlab.rutgers.edu \
--cc=shruti20@gmail.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.