From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:25:33 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] dme1737 and sch311x similarities Message-Id: <20070615202533.64e9a199@hyperion.delvare> List-Id: References: <191fb4ca0706120929k2b63b7afy25e5e92b2dec756b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <191fb4ca0706120929k2b63b7afy25e5e92b2dec756b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Hi Juerg, On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:53:07 -0700, Juerg Haefliger wrote: > On 6/14/07, Jean Delvare wrote: > > A different approach was taken for the ams driver, which also support > > two access methods, but support is in separate files, which can be > > selected (or not) through Kconfig. > > > > The ideal way would be separate kernel modules, so that you don't have > > to exclude options at compilation time, and still don't have to load > > i2c-core if you don't need it. > > Or a split approach with a common module providing all the brains and > two separate modules for i2c/lpc access. Err, yes, that's exactly what I had in mind, actually, even though what I wrote was particularly unclear. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors