All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@daemonizer.de>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
	Gary Zambrano <zambrano@broadcom.com>,
	"Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: b44: high ping times with wireless-dev
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 02:42:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706170242.24214.maxi@daemonizer.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070616154946.5fb6b013@localhost.localdomain>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4454 bytes --]

On Sunday 17 June 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:27:43 +0200
>
> Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@daemonizer.de> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I recently did some test and found out something interesting about the
> > b44 problem I wrote earlier.
> >
> > The problem is the following:
> > When I use my BCM4401 with the b44 driver in wireless-dev I get very high
> > ping times looking like this:
> >
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1863 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=855 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1855 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=855 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=1854 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=854 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=1851 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=851 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=1851 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=851 ms
> >
> > I also found out that shortly after I boot my laptop and log into kde
> > ping times are not that high but start to increase very quickly:
> >
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=53 ttl=64 time=2.19 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=54 ttl=64 time=2.22 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=55 ttl=64 time=2.20 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=56 ttl=64 time=2.20 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=57 ttl=64 time=18.6 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=58 ttl=64 time=1268 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=59 ttl=64 time=268 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=60 ttl=64 time=1268 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=61 ttl=64 time=268 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=62 ttl=64 time=6.08 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=63 ttl=64 time=268 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=64 ttl=64 time=1264 ms
> > 64 bytes from 172.30.10.1: icmp_seq=65 ttl=64 time=264 ms
> >
> > After some time digging around I found out something really interesting.
> > When I play some music ping times are immediately lower. If I stop
> > playing music they are back to the same times as they were before.
> >
> > I guess that there is a problem with interrupts so I post some
> > information of my system in hope it will be usefull.
> >
> > maxi@koala:~$ cat /proc/interrupts
> >           CPU0
> >  0:     126317    XT-PIC-XT        timer
> >  1:       3600    XT-PIC-XT        i8042
> >  2:          0    XT-PIC-XT        cascade
> >  7:          1    XT-PIC-XT        parport0
> >  8:          1    XT-PIC-XT        rtc
> >  9:      17371    XT-PIC-XT        acpi
> > 10:      13237    XT-PIC-XT        firewire_ohci, yenta, yenta,
> > ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb3, uhci_hcd:usb4, Intel 82801DB-ICH4, Intel
> > 82801DB-ICH4 Modem, eth0
> > 11:      89059    XT-PIC-XT        uhci_hcd:usb2, i915@pci:0000:00:02.0
> > 12:        632    XT-PIC-XT        i8042
> > 14:      10354    XT-PIC-XT        libata
> > 15:       7408    XT-PIC-XT        libata
> > NMI:          0
> > ERR:          0
> >
> >
> > [...]
> > ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] enabled at IRQ 10
> > ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:02.0[A] -> Link [LNKD] -> GSI 10 (level, low)
> > -> IRQ 10
> > ssb: Sonics Silicon Backplane found on PCI device 0000:02:02.0
> > b44.c:v2.0
> > eth0: Broadcom 44xx/47xx 10/100BaseT Ethernet 00:c0:9f:29:99:a7
> > [...]
> >
> > This problem did only happen with wireless-dev (checkout this evening)
> > and with -mm kernels I used some time ago for testing. Currently I'm
> > running 2.6.22-rc4 that works perfectly fine and doesn't show that
> > problem.
> >
> > Maxi
>
> Can you build with APIC for uniprocessor.

I did enable CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC and CONFIG_X86_UP_IOAPIC and tried with lapic 
and apic=force but couldn't get APIC working.

>
> There is lots of IRQ sharing, so
>  - one of the other device's may be not handling shared IRQ properly.
>    Try unloading firewhire modem and yenta devices.
>
>  - IRQ might be set edge triggered which doesn't work with NAPI
> 	or shared IRQ.

I did build a kernel without the three mentioned above but the problem is 
still the same. I also did remove everything but eth0 on interrupt 10 so the 
only device using that interrupt is eth0 and then the card completely stopped 
working.

Maxi

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-17  0:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-16 21:27 b44: high ping times with wireless-dev Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-06-16 22:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-06-16 22:49   ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-06-17  0:42   ` Maximilian Engelhardt [this message]
2007-06-17  2:32     ` Michael Buesch
2007-06-17  2:32       ` Michael Buesch
2007-06-17 10:55 ` Michael Buesch
2007-06-17 11:08   ` Michael Buesch
2007-06-17 11:08     ` Michael Buesch
2007-06-17 12:03   ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-06-17 12:03     ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-06-17 12:12     ` Michael Buesch
2007-06-17 12:12       ` Michael Buesch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200706170242.24214.maxi@daemonizer.de \
    --to=maxi@daemonizer.de \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=zambrano@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.