From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dan Aloni <da-x@monatomic.org>,
Chad Tindel <ctindel@users.sourceforge.net>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Why is this patch not in 2.6.22-rc5?
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:23:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070619082302.4b9a5c27@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15712.1181795790@death>
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:36:30 -0700
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> The following patch (based on a patch from Stephen Hemminger
> <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>) removes use after free conditions in
> the unregister path for the bonding master. Without this patch, an
> operation of the form "echo -bond0 > /sys/class/net/bonding_masters"
> would trigger a NULL pointer dereference in sysfs. I was not able to
> induce the failure with the non-sysfs code path, but for consistency I
> updated that code as well.
>
> I also did some testing of the bonding /proc file being open
> while the bond is being deleted, and didn't see any problems there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Hey David, this patch fixes one of the bugs listed in 2.6.22-rc5
list. Jay submitted last week but it hasn't made it upstream.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-19 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-11 5:40 [BUG][PATCH] Fix race condition about network device name allocation Kenji Kaneshige
2007-05-11 15:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-11 16:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-14 1:33 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2007-05-14 15:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-14 8:17 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2007-05-14 15:58 ` [PATCH] " Stephen Hemminger
2007-06-13 9:45 ` Dan Aloni
2007-06-13 16:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-06-14 6:07 ` Dan Aloni
2007-06-13 22:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-06-14 4:36 ` Jay Vosburgh
2007-06-19 15:23 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2007-06-19 17:52 ` Why is this patch not in 2.6.22-rc5? Jeff Garzik
2007-06-19 18:12 ` [PATCH] bonding: Fix use after free in unregister path Jay Vosburgh
2007-06-20 23:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-21 0:09 ` Chris Wright
2007-06-19 22:04 ` Why is this patch not in 2.6.22-rc5? David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070619082302.4b9a5c27@localhost.localdomain \
--to=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ctindel@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=da-x@monatomic.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.