From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:15:16 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Proposal Message-Id: <20070619101516.45db4118@hyperion.delvare> List-Id: References: <200704081630.17151.hjk@linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <200704081630.17151.hjk@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark, On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:42:13 -0400, Mark M. Hoffman wrote: > A chip like uguru breaks this model, because we have *no* *idea* what it = might > be measuring at the *pin*. But it turns out, it doesn't matter. I don't think I agree with this statement. There are not dozens of ways to measure a voltage. The chip must have an ADC. The table in Hans' driver (derived from the .ini file provided by Abit) suggests a 10 mV LSB. Assuming an 8-bit ADC, this means a range from 0 to 2.55V, and the other scaling factors seem to confirm this (*3 for 5V, *6 for 12V.) If we know which chip Abit is using (still a W83L950D as for the previous =B5Gurus?) we might even be able to verify this. --=20 Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors