From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: pj@sgi.com
Cc: clameter@sgi.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: cpuset attach_task to touch per-cpu kernel threads?
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:19:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070621014935.GF10980@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Paul,
You had once revealed a cute one-line command to move all tasks from
one cpuset to another [1], which was:
# move all tasks from top cpuset to 'foo' cpuset
sed -nu p < /dev/cpuset/tasks > /dev/cpuset/foo/tasks
I somewhat regret now having fallen for it and using it in my scripts.
To my agony, I found that it moves per-cpu kernel threads too, forcibly
breaking their affinity. In my case, rq->migration thread
(kernel/sched.c) was moved off cpu3 and started running on cpu2, which
caused nasty problems for me. I am sure this can lead to problems for
other per-cpu kernel threads, if their assumption of per-cpu'ness is
broken this way.
One could argue that 'root' user did this and nothing wrong in assuming
he knows what he is doing.
But I am wondering if attach_task() should leave kernel threads alone and
act only upon user-space threads. Or maybe allow movement if it doesn't
result in changing kernel-threads's cpu affinity.
Do you have anything to say regarding this?
Fyi, this was what I was doing (as root):
#!/bin/bash
mount -t container -o cpuset none /dev/cpuset
cd /dev/cpuset
mkdir sys # create a cpuset to move all tasks into
mkdir test # test cpuset in which my tests will run
# Assign cpus to both cpusets
cd sys; echo 0-2 > cpus; echo 0 > mems; echo 1 > cpu_exclusive; cd ..
cd test; echo 3 > cpus; echo 0 > mems; echo 1 > cpu_exclusive; cd ..
# Move all tasks to 'sys' cpuset so that cpu3 is dedicated to
# only my chosen tasks
sed -nu p < /dev/cpuset/tasks > /dev/cpuset/tasks
echo $$ > test/tasks
/path_to/test_prg
References:
1. http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=115627306628524
--
Regards,
vatsa
next reply other threads:[~2007-06-21 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-21 1:49 Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2007-06-21 2:35 ` cpuset attach_task to touch per-cpu kernel threads? Paul Jackson
2007-06-21 12:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-21 17:07 ` Paul Jackson
2007-06-21 17:32 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-21 17:51 ` Paul Jackson
2007-06-22 17:16 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-22 17:41 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070621014935.GF10980@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.