All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bracing the loop in kernel/softirq.c
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:49:33 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070621134933.GA6589@cvg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a8748490706201401m36b1e917g5a600951d48e4cf8@mail.gmail.com>

[Jesper Juhl - Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:01:44PM +0200]
| From: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
| To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
| Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
| Subject: Re: [PATCH] bracing the loop in kernel/softirq.c
| Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:01:44 +0200
| 
> On 20/06/07, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This trivial patch adds braces over a one-line
>> loop. That makes code...well... little bit
>> convenient for (possible) further modifications.
>>
> That's generally not done.
>
> It's even in Documentation/CodingStyle :
>
> "
> Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do.
>
> if (condition)
>        action();
> "
>
> -- 
> Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
> Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
> Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
>

Hi Jasper,

look, the CodingStyle is absolutely right BUT:

	- dropping the braces are good solution for 'if' statement indeed
	- dropping the braces are _not_ good for 'do' - 'while' loop 'case
	  it fails on further loop modifications. Moreover adding these braces
	  we don't change amount of lines in code! So why souldn't we? I don't
	  see any reason not to do.

		Cyrill


  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-21 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-20 17:57 [PATCH] bracing the loop in kernel/softirq.c Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-20 21:01 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-06-21 13:49   ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2007-06-21 17:20     ` Jesper Juhl
2007-06-21 17:32       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-21 18:52   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-06-21 19:11     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-22 15:54     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-22 18:05       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070621134933.GA6589@cvg \
    --to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.