From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5658DDE33 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 23:12:02 +1000 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:12:01 +0200 From: "Gerhard Pircher" In-Reply-To: <1182468169.24740.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20070622131201.313400@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20070618185715.321010@gmx.net> <1182429406.24740.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070621132059.25900@gmx.net> <1182468169.24740.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> Subject: Re: [RFC] Device tree for new desktop platform in arch/powerpc To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Datum: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:22:49 +1000 Von: Benjamin Herrenschmidt An: Gerhard Pircher CC: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Betreff: Re: [RFC] Device tree for new desktop platform in arch/powerpc > Do you have the recommended practice "interrupt mapping" standard ? Yes, downloaded it right now. > It also allowed to make it optional to have nodes for the PCI devices in > slots, you can provide the mapping of all 4 INT# lines in the bridge > node and linux can use it when probing for devices, so your bootwrapper > doesn't have to know what's in the slots and doesn't have to create > device nodes for those. I would like to have PCI nodes only for the PCI host and PCI2ISA bridge. The interrupt mapping of the INT# lines can be configured within U-boot, thus I would avoid to specify it somewhere in the device tree, if it isn't really necessary. Gerhard -- Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kanns mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger