From: Paolo Ornati <ornati@fastwebnet.it>
To: Alberto Gonzalez <info@gnebu.es>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question about fair schedulers
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:06:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070623090655.36d1794c@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706230007.15622.info@gnebu.es>
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:07:15 +0200
Alberto Gonzalez <info@gnebu.es> wrote:
> My conclusion is that SD behaves as expected: it's more fair. But for a
> desktop, shouldn't an "intelligently unfair" scheduler be better?
"intelligently unfair" is what the current scheduler is (because of
interactivity estimator).
When it works (say 90% of the time) the desktop feels really good...
but when it doesn't it can be a disaster.
Look this for example:
http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/6aa5c93c379ae9e1/98ab31c0e6fed2ee?&hl=en#98ab31c0e6fed2ee
--
Paolo Ornati
Linux 2.6.22-rc5-g0864a4e2 on x86_64
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-23 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-22 22:07 Question about fair schedulers Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-23 0:55 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-06-23 7:46 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-23 16:35 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-06-23 17:28 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-24 20:57 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-06-24 19:36 ` David Schwartz
2007-06-26 12:19 ` Helge Hafting
2007-06-27 12:39 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-23 7:06 ` Paolo Ornati [this message]
2007-06-23 8:01 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-23 8:23 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-06-23 9:18 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-23 9:28 ` Russell Harmon
2007-06-23 10:30 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-06-23 10:45 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-23 10:50 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-06-23 11:00 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-23 11:05 ` Tom Spink
2007-06-23 11:26 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-23 11:51 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-06-27 20:28 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-06-23 13:26 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-06-23 13:56 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-23 14:28 ` Paolo Ornati
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070623090655.36d1794c@localhost \
--to=ornati@fastwebnet.it \
--cc=info@gnebu.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.