From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755396AbXFXIlZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jun 2007 04:41:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753539AbXFXIlS (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jun 2007 04:41:18 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:53431 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752970AbXFXIlQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jun 2007 04:41:16 -0400 Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 00:06:02 -0700 From: Greg KH To: "Huang, Ying" Cc: "Stefan Richter" , "Cornelia Huck" , "Adrian Bunk" , "david@lang.hm" , "David Miller" , "bunk@stusta.de; Duncan Sands" , "Phillip Susi" , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: multithreaded probing - more parallelism control Message-ID: <20070624070601.GB24941@kroah.com> References: <1182373258.30574.30.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1182373258.30574.30.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 09:00:58PM +0000, Huang, Ying wrote: > Hi, > > This is a new version of multithreaded probing patch, with more > parallelism control added. > > There are more control over which devices and drivers will be probed > parallelized or serially. For example, in IEEE1394 subsystem, the > different "units" in one "node" can be probed serially while the > different "nodes" can be probed parallelized. > > The number of threads can be controlled through a kernel command line > parameters. > > The patch is against 2.6.22-rc5. The "wait_for_probes" function in the > patch comes from the original multithreaded probing patch. If I need do > anything because of it, please let me know. > > Any comment is welcome. I'm still not convinced that we need to add this kind of complexity to the driver core, instead of just letting the individual driver subsystems do this, if they want to do it. Especially as no subsystem wants to do this today :) thanks, greg k-h