From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v18
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 17:52:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070624155214.GA11978@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070623132418.GA32449@1wt.eu>
* Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> Today I had a little time to try CFS again (last time it was -v9!). I
> ran it on top of 2.6.20.14, and simply tried ocbench again. You
> remember ? With -v9, I ran 64 processes which all progressed very
> smoothly. With -v18, it's not the case anymore. When I run 64
> processes, only 7 of them show smooth rounds, while all the other ones
> are only updated once a second. Sometimes they only progress by one
> iteration, sometimes by a full round. Some are even updated once ever
> 2 seconds, because if I drag an xterm above them and quickly remove
> it, the xterm leaves a trace there for up to 2 seconds.
>
> Also, only one of my 2 CPUs is used. I see the rq vary between 1 and
> 5, with a permanent 50% idle... :
>
> procs memory swap io system cpu
> r b w swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id
> 1 0 0 0 874400 7864 90436 0 0 0 0 279 2204 50 0 50
> 3 0 0 0 874408 7864 90436 0 0 0 0 273 2122 50 1 50
> 1 0 0 0 874408 7864 90436 0 0 0 0 253 1660 49 1 50
> 3 0 0 0 874408 7864 90436 0 0 0 0 252 1977 50 0 50
> 2 0 0 0 874408 7864 90436 0 0 0 0 253 2274 49 1 50
> 3 0 0 0 874408 7864 90436 0 0 0 0 252 1846 49 1 50
> 1 0 0 0 874408 7864 90436 0 0 0 0 339 1782 49 1 50
>
> I have no idea about what version brought that unexpected behaviour,
> but it's clearly something which needs to be tracked down.
hm, the two problems might be related. Could you try v17 perhaps? In v18
i have 'unified' all the sched.c's between the various kernel releases,
maybe that brought in something unexpected on 2.6.20.14. (perhaps try
v2.6.21.5 based cfs too?)
> My scheduler is at 250 Hz, and here are the values I found in
> /proc/sys/kernel:
could you send me the file the cfs-debug-info.sh script produced. You
can pick the script up from:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/cfs-debug-info.sh
(i'd suggest to send it in private mail, output is large and detailed.
If your kernel has no /proc/config.gz then please send me your .config
file too.)
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-24 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-22 22:02 [patch] CFS scheduler, -v18 Ingo Molnar
2007-06-22 22:09 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2007-06-22 22:16 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2007-06-22 22:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-26 3:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-26 8:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-26 9:00 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-26 9:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-22 23:08 ` Gene Heskett
2007-06-23 7:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-23 9:55 ` Gene Heskett
2007-06-23 10:22 ` Antonino Ingargiola
2007-06-23 17:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-24 10:02 ` Antonino Ingargiola
2007-06-24 11:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-25 7:27 ` Antonino Ingargiola
2007-06-23 13:24 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-06-24 15:52 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-06-24 17:08 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-06-24 20:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-26 20:17 ` Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
2007-06-27 10:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-30 21:06 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-07-01 8:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-01 8:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-01 9:00 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-07-02 11:44 ` Vegard Nossum
2007-07-02 13:01 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-07-02 13:43 ` Vegard Nossum
2007-07-02 15:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-02 16:40 ` Vegard Nossum
2007-07-02 18:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-03 7:01 ` Vegard Nossum
2007-07-03 7:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-07-03 7:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-03 8:08 ` Keith Packard
2007-07-03 8:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-04 12:11 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-02 14:13 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-03 7:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-03 9:11 ` Vegard Nossum
[not found] <8yZun-1bO-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <8CszT-4hd-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <8CtPi-6qj-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <8Cus1-7eL-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <8CwtU-1Z5-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <8Cxgd-3fN-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <8CKQ8-7HN-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <8CKZV-7Ur-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <8CLCt-vX-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
2007-07-05 13:29 ` Thomas Dickey
[not found] ` <8CM5x-19K-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
2007-07-05 13:39 ` Thomas Dickey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070624155214.GA11978@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.