From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Björn Steinbrink" <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>,
eranian@hpl.hp.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
levon@movementarian.org, perfmon@napali.hpl.hp.com,
oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net, wcohen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Always probe the NMI watchdog
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:36:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706252136.18366.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070625120926.0a86373c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Monday 25 June 2007 21:09, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:34:48 +0200
>
> Bj__rn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de> wrote:
> > The performance counter allocator relies on the nmi watchdog being
> > probed, so we have to do that even if the watchdog is not enabled.
>
> So... what's the status of this lot?
>
> I've just merged this patch and the second one:
>
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Reserve the right performance counter for the Intel
> PerfMon NMI watchdog Message-ID: <20070620183551.GC3251@atjola.homenet>
>
> but there was no followup discussion afaict.
>
> Andi, Stephane: acks?
Yes, although I'm still a little uneasy about the always probe one.
> If acked, do we agree that this is 2.6.22 material?
The first (always probe) is probably .22 material, but needs more testing
first.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-25 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-12 15:02 OProfile issues Stephane Eranian
2007-06-12 18:37 ` Chris Wright
2007-06-12 18:38 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-06-12 19:07 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-13 1:41 ` [PATCH] Separate performance counter reservation from nmi watchdog Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-13 16:46 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-18 9:52 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-06-18 10:32 ` Björn Steinbrink
[not found] ` <11823357571842-git-send-email->
2007-06-20 10:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] Separate the performance counter allocation from the LAPIC NMI watchdog Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-20 10:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] Finish separation of the performance counter allocator from the " Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-20 12:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] Separate the performance counter allocation from the LAPIC " Andi Kleen
2007-06-20 12:49 ` [perfmon] " Stephane Eranian
2007-06-20 13:01 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-20 18:33 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-20 18:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] Always probe the " Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-25 19:09 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-25 19:36 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-06-25 20:01 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-06-25 20:36 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-25 21:04 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-25 21:06 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-20 18:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] Reserve the right performance counter for the Intel PerfMon " Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-20 21:59 ` [perfmon] Re: [PATCH 1/2] Separate the performance counter allocation from the LAPIC " Stephane Eranian
2007-06-21 8:36 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-06-22 7:13 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-22 10:02 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-06-20 13:18 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-20 10:49 ` [PATCH 0/2] Performance counter allocator separation Björn Steinbrink
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-26 8:04 [PATCH 1/2] Always probe the NMI watchdog Mikael Pettersson
2007-06-26 9:57 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-06-26 10:35 Mikael Pettersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200706252136.18366.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eranian@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=levon@movementarian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=perfmon@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.