From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:39:44 +0100 (BST) Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:49643 "EHLO mail.lst.de") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20022386AbXF0Pjk (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:39:40 +0100 Received: from verein.lst.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lst.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id l5RFdXNK006080 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:39:33 +0200 Received: (from hch@localhost) by verein.lst.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id l5RFdW1j006078; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:39:32 +0200 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:39:32 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Atsushi Nemoto Cc: vagabon.xyz@gmail.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic clk API implementation for MIPS Message-ID: <20070627153932.GA6016@lst.de> References: <20070626.233332.74753130.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20070627.013312.25479645.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070627.013312.25479645.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 15556 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: hch@lst.de Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 01:33:12AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > This MIPS implementation is derived (and stripped) from the SH > implementation. Why is this not in architecture-independent code?