All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit@rabbit.us>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
	Alan Piszcz <ap@solarrain.com>
Subject: Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:05:37 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070628220537.GC31489@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706280426500.1406@p34.internal.lan>

On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 04:27:15AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> 
> >Justin Piszcz wrote:
> >>mdadm --create \
> >>      --verbose /dev/md3 \
> >>      --level=5 \
> >>      --raid-devices=10 \
> >>      --chunk=1024 \
> >>      --force \
> >>      --run
> >>      /dev/sd[cdefghijkl]1
> >>
> >>Justin.
> >
> >Interesting, I came up with the same results (1M chunk being superior) 
> >with a completely different raid set with XFS on top:
> >
> >mdadm	--create \
> >	--level=10 \
> >	--chunk=1024 \
> >	--raid-devices=4 \
> >	--layout=f3 \
> >	...
> >
> >Could it be attributed to XFS itself?

More likely it's related to the I/O size being sent to the disks. The larger
the chunk size, the larger the I/o hitting each disk. I think the maximum I/O
size is 512k ATM on x86(_64), so a chunk of 1MB will guarantee that there are
maximally sized I/Os being sent to the disk....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-28 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-27 23:20 Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k Justin Piszcz
2007-06-27 23:20 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-27 23:24   ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-28  5:08   ` David Chinner
2007-06-28  7:53     ` David Greaves
2007-06-28  8:07     ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-28  3:43 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-28  8:07   ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-28  8:24     ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-28  8:27       ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-28  8:36         ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-28  8:38           ` Justin Piszcz
2007-07-03  4:23             ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2007-07-03  8:42               ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-28  8:42           ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-28  8:46             ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-28 22:05         ` David Chinner [this message]
2007-06-28  9:05       ` Matti Aarnio
2007-06-28 11:19         ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-28 13:27         ` Jon Nelson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070628220537.GC31489@sgi.com \
    --to=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=ap@solarrain.com \
    --cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rabbit@rabbit.us \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.