From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [NETPOLL] netconsole: fix soft lockup when removing module
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 21:35:58 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070701173558.GA207@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>
> #1
> Until kernel ver. 2.6.21 (including) cancel_rearming_delayed_work()
> required a work function should always (unconditionally) rearm with
> delay > 0 - otherwise it would endlessly loop. This patch replaces
> this function with cancel_delayed_work(). Later kernel versions don't
> require this, so here it's only for uniformity.
But 2.6.22 doesn't need this change, why it was merged?
In fact, I suspect this change adds a race,
> --- a/net/core/netpoll.c
> +++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
> @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ static void queue_process(struct work_struct *work)
> netif_tx_unlock(dev);
> local_irq_restore(flags);
>
> - schedule_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work, HZ/10);
> + if (atomic_read(&npinfo->refcnt))
> + schedule_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work, HZ/10);
> return;
> }
> netif_tx_unlock(dev);
> @@ -785,9 +786,15 @@ void netpoll_cleanup(struct netpoll *np)
> if (atomic_dec_and_test(&npinfo->refcnt)) {
> skb_queue_purge(&npinfo->arp_tx);
> skb_queue_purge(&npinfo->txq);
> - cancel_rearming_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work);
> + cancel_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work);
> flush_scheduled_work();
Suppose that ->refcnt == 1, and queue_process() was preempted just after
atomic_read(&npinfo->refcnt).
netpoll_cleanup() comes, cancel_delayed_work() does nothing, flush_scheduled_work()
sleeps.
queue_process() gets CPU, re-schedules ->tx_work, and returns.
flush_scheduled_work() completes, netpoll_cleanup() frees npinfo and returns
while ->tx_work is pending.
No?
Oleg.
next reply other threads:[~2007-07-01 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-01 17:35 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2007-07-02 6:34 ` [NETPOLL] netconsole: fix soft lockup when removing module Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-02 9:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-02 11:08 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-02 7:52 ` [PATCH] " Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-02 8:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-02 10:12 ` [PATCH 2/2][NETPOLL] netconsole: delete flush_scheduled_work Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-04 6:41 ` [PATCH] Re: [NETPOLL] netconsole: fix soft lockup when removing module Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-04 6:47 ` David Miller
2007-07-04 7:08 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-04 7:21 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070701173558.GA207@tv-sign.ru \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.