All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: Szabolcs Illes <S.Illes@westminster.ac.uk>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: After reboot fs with barrier faster deletes then fs with nobarrier
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 23:01:50 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070702130150.GK989688@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.tuomcyagf7nho5@project1.cpc.wmin.ac.uk>

On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 01:01:36PM +0100, Szabolcs Illes wrote:
> on my desktop pc:
> 
> WCE=1

hot-cache/cold cache nobarrier is faster. same results as I got.
After reboot, nobarrier is way slow.

> WCE=0

hot-cache/cold-cache is pretty much identical. Same results I got.
After reboot, nobarrier is way slow.

> for cold cache I used: echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches

Same here.

> it looks like this machine is only affected after reboot, maybe the hdd  
> has more cache, then the hdd in my 3 years old laptop.
> on my laptop it was enought to clear the kernel cache.
> 
> How did you do your "cold" tests? reboot or drop_caches?

drop_caches.

So there definitely appears to be something about a reboot that is
causing an issue here. I'll see if I can reproduce it here.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group

      reply	other threads:[~2007-07-02 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-27 17:58 After reboot fs with barrier faster deletes then fs with nobarrier Szabolcs Illes
2007-06-27 21:45 ` Chris Wedgwood
2007-06-27 22:18   ` Szabolcs Illes
2007-06-27 22:20 ` David Chinner
2007-06-28  5:00   ` Timothy Shimmin
2007-06-28 14:22     ` Szabolcs Illes
2007-06-28 22:02     ` David Chinner
2007-06-29  7:03       ` Timothy Shimmin
2007-06-29  0:16 ` David Chinner
2007-06-29 12:01   ` Szabolcs Illes
2007-07-02 13:01     ` David Chinner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070702130150.GK989688@sgi.com \
    --to=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=S.Illes@westminster.ac.uk \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.