From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression: 2.6.22-rcX: hda: lost interrupt
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 20:20:00 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070704102000.GN989688@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <468516B9.1080300@garzik.org>
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:27:05AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> David Chinner wrote:
> >Folks,
> >
> >After updating an x86_64 machine from 2.6.21 to 2.6.22-rc6 and
> >fighting off the where-the-fuck-did-my-serial-console-go blues
> >(legacy_serial.force), I finally discovered why the damn thing
> >wasn't booting - the machine was sitting there in a loop outputting
> >"hda: lost interrupt" over and over again during hardware
> >discovery (hda = dvd drive).
> >
> >It doesn't happen on every boot - more boots hung than failed,
> >though, while I was trying to work out where my serial port
> >went and get some work done.
> >
> >Since I've had the console operative, the boot hangs are
> >basically like:
> >
> >ESB2: IDE controller at PCI slot 0000:00:1f.1
> >ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:1f.1[A] -> GSI 20 (level, low) -> IRQ20
> >ESB2: chipset revision 9
> >ESB2: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
> > ide0: DM-DMA at 0x50a0-0x50a7, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio
> > ide1: DM-DMA at 0x50a8-0x50af, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio
> >Probing IDE interface ide0...
> >hda: probing with STATUS(0xa0) instead of ALTSTATUS(0x58)
> >hda: <some ctrl char>, ATAPI UNKNOWN (type 31) drive
> >hdb: probing with STATUS(0xb0) instead of ALTSTATUS(0x00)
> >hdb: probing with STATUS(0xa1) instead of ALTSTATUS(0x51)
> >hdb: <some ctrl char>, ATAPI UNKNOWN (type 31) drive
> >hda: set_drive_speed_status: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete
> >DataRequest }
> >hda: set_drive_speed_status: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
> >hda: set_drive_speed_status: error=0x04 { AbortedCommand }
> >ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
> >hda: lost interrupt
> >hda: lost interrupt
> >hda: lost interrupt
> >hda: lost interrupt
> >hda: lost interrupt
> >hda: lost interrupt
> >hda: lost interrupt
> >hda: lost interrupt
> >hda: lost interrupt
> >hda: lost interrupt
> >hda: lost interrupt
>
> What is the behavior under libata?
>
> If you see timeouts/etc. there too, it might be an interrupt routing or
> hardware problem.
Sorry to take so long to get back to this, Jeff.
I think the problem is on my side. It looks like a dodgy initrd
was causing the problems - a statically built kernel detects
the DVD drive without any issues so there may not be a problem
here at all. I'll continue trying to track down why the initrd
was not being built properly...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-04 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-29 12:42 Regression: 2.6.22-rcX: hda: lost interrupt David Chinner
2007-06-29 14:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-07-04 10:20 ` David Chinner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070704102000.GN989688@sgi.com \
--to=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.