From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: nigel@suspend2.net, benh@kernel.crashing.org, pavel@ucw.cz,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org,
oliver@neukum.org, paulus@samba.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm] PM: Do not sync filesystems from within the freezer
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 12:00:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200707061200.37035.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1I6kA9-0003Zt-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
On Friday, 6 July 2007 11:31, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 09:13 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Another myth, that has been debunked already. The problem is: how do
> > > > > you define fuse processes? There's no theoretical or even practial
> > > > > way to do that.
> > > >
> > > > It could if they told the kernel via some black magic ...
> > > >
> > > > But that still suck. The freezer sucks :-)
> > >
> > > Yeah, and it wouldn't work in practice, since the auxilary tasks might
> > > be part of a library which is not even aware of being used by a "fuse
> > > task".
> >
> > This is why I think the whole concept of filesystems in userspace is broken.
> > Trying to shift things that need special privilege and special handling to
> > userspace is just asking for trouble.
>
> I'm not claiming fuse doesn't introduce problems. I've been tackling
> those problems for a number of years now. Suspend/hibernate is just
> the next thing that needs looking at.
>
> Just blaming either suspend or fuse for these problems is unproductive
> and stupid.
Well, the "stupid" part is a bit offensive, don't you think?
> The problems _are_ solvable if not always simply.
Agreed.
> > You can say it's the kernel code's fault, but then you have to
> > explain why it's only fuse (yeah ok, and XFS) that have problems.
>
> I'm not faulting anythig. My opinion, is that the freezer is not
> needed for suspend, and removing it will not just solve the problems
> with fuse but several others. It probably needs a lot of work, but
> hey, that's why we are here.
>
> The patch posted by Rafael, which lets the freezer skip uninterrupible
> tasks is a step in the right direction.
Thanks.
BTW, I think that this is just less radical than the change proposed by Matthew
and it should address the underlying problems.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-06 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-04 14:58 [RFC][PATCH -mm] PM: Do not sync from within the freezer during suspend to RAM Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-04 22:48 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-04 22:48 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-04 22:49 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-04 22:49 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-04 22:52 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-04 22:52 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-05 11:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-05 11:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-05 11:37 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-05 20:31 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm] PM: Do not sync filesystems from within the freezer Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-05 22:00 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-05 22:00 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-06 7:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-06 7:07 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-06 7:07 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-06 7:13 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-07-06 7:13 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-07-06 7:19 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-06 7:36 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-07-07 11:48 ` possible solution for problem 2 (was Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm] PM: Do not sync filesystems from within the freezer) Pavel Machek
2007-07-07 11:48 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-06 7:36 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm] PM: Do not sync filesystems from within the freezer Miklos Szeredi
2007-07-06 7:19 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-06 8:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-06 8:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-06 9:05 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-07-06 9:05 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-07-06 9:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-06 9:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-06 9:31 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-07-06 9:31 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-07-06 10:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2007-07-06 10:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-06 7:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-05 11:37 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm] PM: Do not sync from within the freezer during suspend to RAM Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200707061200.37035.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=nigel@suspend2.net \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.