From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Thread Migration Preemption
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 10:23:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070706142339.GA32754@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070706060257.GA188@tv-sign.ru>
* Oleg Nesterov (oleg@tv-sign.ru) wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >
> > This patch adds the ability to protect critical sections from migration to
> > another CPU without disabling preemption.
> >
> > Typical use:
> >
> > migration_disable();
> > local_inc(&__get_cpu_var(&my_local_t_var));
> > migration_enable();
> >
> > --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/kernel/sched.c 2007-07-05 16:28:15.000000000 -0400
> > +++ linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/sched.c 2007-07-05 16:53:24.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -1996,6 +1996,7 @@
> > * 1) running (obviously), or
> > * 2) cannot be migrated to this CPU due to cpus_allowed, or
> > * 3) are cache-hot on their current CPU.
> > + * 4) migration preemption is non 0 for this non running task.
> > */
> > if (!cpu_isset(this_cpu, p->cpus_allowed))
> > return 0;
> > @@ -2003,6 +2004,8 @@
> >
> > if (task_running(rq, p))
> > return 0;
> > + if (task_thread_info(p)->migration_count)
> > + return 0;
>
Hi Oleg,
> Question: This means that the task could be preempted, but can't sleep, yes?
>
No exactly. This means that the task can be preempted, and can therefore
sleep, but we do not allow this sleeping task to be migrated to a
different CPU.
> Because try_to_wake_up() can change ->cpu. Shouldn't might_sleep() check
> ->migration_count then? Or we can change try_to_wake_up().
>
If we look at try_to_wake_up, it seems to take the new_cpu from
task_cpu(), which comes from the thread info ->cpu, updated by
set_task_cpu(). The *_move_tasks seems to be responsible for calling
can_migrate_task() to see if, in a deferred way, the migration_thread
can use set_task_cpu() to change the task's cpu.
move_task_off_dead_cpu() does not seem to respect this though: it could
potentially move away a process while it is in a critical section by
forcing a __migrate_task. I guess I should put a test in __migrate_task
also so move_task_off_dead_cpu() can try to repeat the migration.
> What if the task does copy_process() under migration_disable() ? Child
> gets a copy of ->migration_count.
>
Right. Neighter does copy_process set the preemption count. It seems to
be dealt by sched_fork() when the thread is first scheduled in to make
sure that the preempt count is 1. I guess is would be safer to set the
migration count to 0 there too. (or set it to one if we ever decide to
make it the kernel default).
> Also, cpu_down() still can migrate this task to another CPU.
>
Yes, just noted this earlier. I first thought it was using
can_migrate_task(), but it does not seem so.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> Oleg.
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-06 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-06 6:02 [RFC] Thread Migration Preemption Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-06 14:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2007-07-06 14:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-11 4:49 ` [RFC] Thread Migration Preemption - v2 Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-11 16:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-14 18:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-14 19:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-14 18:40 ` [RFC] Thread Migration Preemption - v3 Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-14 18:42 ` [RFC] Thread Migration Preemption - v4 Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-14 19:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-07-14 20:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-14 19:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-07-14 20:26 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-14 20:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-14 20:33 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-14 20:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-05 21:51 [RFC] Thread Migration Preemption Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-05 22:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2007-07-06 6:12 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-06 14:34 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-06 14:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2007-07-06 15:43 ` Daniel Walker
2007-07-08 9:05 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-10 23:39 ` Matt Mackall
2007-07-11 0:02 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-11 0:36 ` Matt Mackall
2007-07-11 0:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-11 1:15 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-06 11:59 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-06 14:41 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-06 17:11 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-11 4:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-23 18:33 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070706142339.GA32754@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.