From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kratochvil <honza@jikos.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ernie Petrides <petrides@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] PIE randomization
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 08:30:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070707123004.GZ7012@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707070205460.11634@jikos.suse.cz>
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 02:13:01AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > So the original patch has:
> > #define BAD_ADDR(x) ((unsigned long)(x) >= TASK_SIZE)
> > For some reason(?) it got changed to the clearly buggy:
> > #define BAD_ADDR(x) ((unsigned long)(x) >= PAGE_MASK)
> > Jiri's patch undoes that second buggy define, which is very
> > different from the original that was sent in by you and Ernie.
>
> This is a part of execshield patch, fthe pie-compiled binary executable
> memory layout randomization was extracted from - see
> http://people.redhat.com/~mingo/exec-shield/exec-shield-nx-2.6.19.patch
>
> Note that load_elf_interp() in vanilla kernel differs from the
> execshield's (and pie-randomization.patch) version.
>
> The fix makes the BAD_ADDR check whether the address belongs to the
> ERR_PTR range, which seems valid for all uses of BAD_ADDR in the patched
> binfmt_elf.c (do_brk(), elf_map(), do_mmap() etc return valid address or
> err ptr) ... am I missing something obvious here?
I believe BAD_ADDR macro was changes from ((unsigned long)(x) >= TASK_SIZE)
(which is the right test for invalid user addresses, stronger check than
>= PAGE_MASK) to >= PAGE_MASK only because of the one check of the return
value of load_elf_interp. All other uses of BAD_ADDR macro are either on
userland addresses (what do_mmap, elf_map, do_brk etc. return;
where TASK_SIZE or more is certainly wrong) or in one case still on unbiased
ELF p_vaddr:
if (BAD_ADDR(k) || elf_ppnt->p_filesz > elf_ppnt->p_memsz ||
in load_elf_binary (where >= TASK_SIZE check is ok too).
So perhaps doing this instead of changing BAD_ADDR to IS_ERR_VAL
might be better:
Signed-off-by: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
--- linux/fs/binfmt_elf.c 2007-06-08 21:53:45.000000000 +0200
+++ linux/fs/binfmt_elf.c 2007-07-07 14:19:14.000000000 +0200
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static struct linux_binfmt elf_format =
.hasvdso = 1
};
-#define BAD_ADDR(x) ((unsigned long)(x) >= PAGE_MASK)
+#define BAD_ADDR(x) ((unsigned long)(x) >= TASK_SIZE)
static int set_brk(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
@@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ static int load_elf_binary(struct linux_
interpreter,
&interp_map_addr,
load_bias);
- if (!BAD_ADDR(elf_entry)) {
+ if (!IS_ERR((void *)elf_entry)) {
/* load_elf_interp() returns relocation adjustment */
interp_load_addr = elf_entry;
elf_entry += loc->interp_elf_ex.e_entry;
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-07 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-11 12:33 [PATCH][RESEND] PIE randomization Jan Kratochvil
2007-05-11 19:56 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-11 20:18 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-05-11 20:36 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-11 22:41 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-11 23:50 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-05-16 17:14 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-05-17 20:24 ` Jan Kratochvil
2007-05-17 21:50 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-05-18 17:29 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-21 14:58 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-05-22 23:16 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-23 8:50 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-07-04 8:25 ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-07-04 17:35 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-07-05 20:53 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-07-05 20:57 ` Rik van Riel
2007-07-07 0:13 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-07-07 12:30 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2007-07-09 11:41 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-07-09 21:58 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-07-10 9:47 ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-07-11 9:58 ` Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070707123004.GZ7012@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=honza@jikos.cz \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=petrides@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.