From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] PATCH: hwmon-abituguru-check-dmi-vendor.patch
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:37:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070709203700.270ecfd4@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4690D52A.7040402@hhs.nl>
Hi Hans, Mark,
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 20:06:10 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> No 2.6.23 is fine. No worries, they should have named the thread
> CONFIG_SHOOT_MYSELF_IN_THE_FOOT.
Agreed.
> This patch is just a layer of security to
> prevent people doing stupid things. I only wrote the patch because some people
> thought it would be a good idea to prevent people from doing stupid things with
> regards to medling with the kernel, however when you enter into that realm
> there is really no end of stupid things one can do, so I wonder how wise it is
> to try and protect people against themselves.
I don't consider loading a kernel driver to be a "stupid thing". And
even if you think it is, well, people sometimes do that. I can remember
several posts to the lm-sensors list in the past few years, starting
with "I tried to load all the drivers, but without success." Given that
the abituguru accesses I/O ports without requesting them, and has a
relatively weak detection, I believe it is fair to make sure it won't
load on boards where it has no chance to be useful.
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-09 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-08 12:14 [lm-sensors] PATCH: hwmon-abituguru-check-dmi-vendor.patch Hans de Goede
2007-07-08 17:52 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2007-07-08 18:06 ` Hans de Goede
2007-07-08 18:07 ` Hans de Goede
2007-07-09 18:27 ` Jean Delvare
2007-07-09 18:37 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2007-07-09 20:37 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-10 9:43 ` Jean Delvare
2007-07-10 15:09 ` Hans de Goede
2007-07-13 17:34 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070709203700.270ecfd4@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.