From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fix handling of pointers in ?:
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 02:07:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070710010733.GQ21668@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070709221306.GP21668@ftp.linux.org.uk>
a) qualifiers are joined (const int * / volatile int * -> const volatile int *)
b) pointer to void / pointer to T => pointer to void (with all qualifiers)
testcase added
Still missing: T1 * / T2 * => pointer to composite type of T1 and T2
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
evaluate.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
validation/cond_expr2.c | 23 +++++++++++++
2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 validation/cond_expr2.c
diff --git a/evaluate.c b/evaluate.c
index d505007..9f543fe 100644
--- a/evaluate.c
+++ b/evaluate.c
@@ -1070,31 +1070,6 @@ OK:
}
/*
- * FIXME!! This should do casts, array degeneration etc..
- */
-static struct symbol *compatible_ptr_type(struct expression *left, struct expression *right)
-{
- struct symbol *ltype = left->ctype, *rtype = right->ctype;
-
- if (ltype->type == SYM_NODE)
- ltype = ltype->ctype.base_type;
-
- if (rtype->type == SYM_NODE)
- rtype = rtype->ctype.base_type;
-
- if (ltype->type == SYM_PTR) {
- if (rtype->ctype.base_type == &void_ctype)
- return ltype;
- }
-
- if (rtype->type == SYM_PTR) {
- if (ltype->ctype.base_type == &void_ctype)
- return rtype;
- }
- return NULL;
-}
-
-/*
* NOTE! The degenerate case of "x ? : y", where we don't
* have a true case, this will possibly promote "x" to the
* same type as "y", and thus _change_ the conditional
@@ -1104,9 +1079,10 @@ static struct symbol *compatible_ptr_type(struct expression *left, struct expres
static struct symbol *evaluate_conditional_expression(struct expression *expr)
{
struct expression **true;
- struct symbol *ctype, *ltype, *rtype;
+ struct symbol *ctype, *ltype, *rtype, *lbase, *rbase;
int lclass, rclass;
const char * typediff;
+ int qual;
if (!evaluate_conditional(expr->conditional, 0))
return NULL;
@@ -1141,9 +1117,11 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_conditional_expression(struct expression *expr)
expr->cond_false = cast_to(expr->cond_false, ctype);
goto out;
}
+
if ((lclass | rclass) & TYPE_PTR) {
int is_null1 = is_null_pointer_constant(*true);
int is_null2 = is_null_pointer_constant(expr->cond_false);
+
if (is_null1 && is_null2) {
*true = cast_to(*true, &ptr_ctype);
expr->cond_false = cast_to(expr->cond_false, &ptr_ctype);
@@ -1169,15 +1147,42 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_conditional_expression(struct expression *expr)
goto Err;
}
/* OK, it's pointer on pointer */
- /* XXX - we need to handle qualifiers */
- ctype = compatible_ptr_type(*true, expr->cond_false);
- if (ctype)
- goto out;
+ if (ltype->ctype.as != rtype->ctype.as) {
+ typediff = "different address spaces";
+ goto Err;
+ }
+
+ /* need to be lazier here */
+ lbase = get_base_type(ltype);
+ rbase = get_base_type(rtype);
+ qual = ltype->ctype.modifiers | rtype->ctype.modifiers;
+ qual &= MOD_CONST | MOD_VOLATILE;
+
+ if (lbase == &void_ctype) {
+ /* XXX: pointers to function should warn here */
+ ctype = ltype;
+ goto Qual;
+
+ }
+ if (rbase == &void_ctype) {
+ /* XXX: pointers to function should warn here */
+ ctype = rtype;
+ goto Qual;
+ }
+ /* XXX: that should be pointer to composite */
+ ctype = ltype;
+ typediff = type_difference(lbase, rbase, MOD_IGN, MOD_IGN);
+ if (!typediff)
+ goto Qual;
+ goto Err;
}
- ctype = ltype;
- typediff = type_difference(ltype, rtype, MOD_IGN, MOD_IGN);
- if (!typediff)
+
+ /* void on void, struct on same struct, union on same union */
+ if (ltype == rtype) {
+ ctype = ltype;
goto out;
+ }
+ typediff = "different base types";
Err:
expression_error(expr, "incompatible types in conditional expression (%s)", typediff);
@@ -1186,6 +1191,17 @@ Err:
out:
expr->ctype = ctype;
return ctype;
+
+Qual:
+ if (qual & ~ctype->ctype.modifiers) {
+ struct symbol *sym = alloc_symbol(ctype->pos, SYM_PTR);
+ *sym = *ctype;
+ sym->ctype.modifiers |= qual;
+ ctype = sym;
+ }
+ *true = cast_to(*true, ctype);
+ expr->cond_false = cast_to(expr->cond_false, ctype);
+ goto out;
}
/* FP assignments can not do modulo or bit operations */
diff --git a/validation/cond_expr2.c b/validation/cond_expr2.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e53cd13
--- /dev/null
+++ b/validation/cond_expr2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+extern const int *p;
+extern volatile void *q;
+extern volatile int *r;
+static void f(void)
+{
+ q = 1 ? p : q; // warn: const volatile void * -> const int *
+ r = 1 ? r : q; // OK: volatile void * -> volatile int *
+ r = 1 ? r : p; // warn: const volatile int * -> volatile int *
+}
+/*
+ * check-name: type of conditional expression
+ * check-description: Used to miss qualifier mixing and mishandle void *
+ * check-command: sparse $file
+ *
+ * check-output-start
+cond_expr2.c:6:4: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different modifiers)
+cond_expr2.c:6:4: expected void volatile *extern [addressable] [toplevel] q
+cond_expr2.c:6:4: got void const volatile *
+cond_expr2.c:8:4: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different modifiers)
+cond_expr2.c:8:4: expected int volatile *extern [addressable] [toplevel] [assigned] r
+cond_expr2.c:8:4: got int const volatile *
+ * check-output-end
+ */
--
1.5.0-rc2.GIT
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-10 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-09 22:13 [PATCH] fix handling of address_space in casts and assignments Al Viro
2007-07-10 1:07 ` Al Viro [this message]
2007-07-12 6:44 ` [PATCH] fix handling of pointers in ?: Josh Triplett
2007-07-12 6:44 ` [PATCH] fix handling of address_space in casts and assignments Josh Triplett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070710010733.GQ21668@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.