From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762189AbXGKKZX (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:25:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759041AbXGKKZJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:25:09 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:48407 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758597AbXGKKZF (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:25:05 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:24:49 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Ram Pai , Al Viro , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, util-linux-ng@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] VFS: Augment /proc/mount with subroot and shared-subtree Message-ID: <20070711102449.GA22185@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ram Pai , Al Viro , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, util-linux-ng@vger.kernel.org References: <1182442837.3342.13.camel@ram.us.ibm.com> <467AB5EE.3030909@zytor.com> <1182494654.2812.22.camel@ram.us.ibm.com> <467B7509.8010106@zytor.com> <1182497690.2812.54.camel@ram.us.ibm.com> <467B7F6F.4030007@zytor.com> <20070625214640.GC29058@ram.us.ibm.com> <1182808816.2816.7.camel@ram.us.ibm.com> <20070630094446.GB22889@infradead.org> <468652E2.4050901@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <468652E2.4050901@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 08:56:02AM -0400, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Is that conjecture, or do you have evidence to that effect? Most users > of this file are using it via the glibc interfaces, and there probably > aren't all that many users of it in the first place. I have written parsers for personal projects that might not have been happy to deal with additional fields myself for example.. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] VFS: Augment /proc/mount with subroot and shared-subtree Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:24:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20070711102449.GA22185@infradead.org> References: <1182442837.3342.13.camel@ram.us.ibm.com> <467AB5EE.3030909@zytor.com> <1182494654.2812.22.camel@ram.us.ibm.com> <467B7509.8010106@zytor.com> <1182497690.2812.54.camel@ram.us.ibm.com> <467B7F6F.4030007@zytor.com> <20070625214640.GC29058@ram.us.ibm.com> <1182808816.2816.7.camel@ram.us.ibm.com> <20070630094446.GB22889@infradead.org> <468652E2.4050901@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Ram Pai , Al Viro , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, util-linux-ng-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <468652E2.4050901-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: util-linux-ng-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 08:56:02AM -0400, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Is that conjecture, or do you have evidence to that effect? Most users > of this file are using it via the glibc interfaces, and there probably > aren't all that many users of it in the first place. I have written parsers for personal projects that might not have been happy to deal with additional fields myself for example..