From: Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@ru.mvista.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@technotrade.biz>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: MPC82xx ADS SCC ports initialisation
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:34:22 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070711143422.6b00620e@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200707110911.19477.laurent.pinchart@technotrade.biz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2234 bytes --]
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:11:18 +0200
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 July 2007 20:11, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 04:19:51PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > clrbits32(&immap->im_cpmux.cmx_scr, (0x00000007 << (4 -
> > > data->clk_tx))); clrbits32(&immap->im_cpmux.cmx_scr, (0x00000038
> > > << (4 - data->clk_rx))); setbits32(&immap->im_cpmux.cmx_scr,
> > > ((data->clk_tx - 1) << (4 - data->clk_tx)));
> > > setbits32(&immap->im_cpmux.cmx_scr,
> > > ((data->clk_rx - 1) << (4 - data->clk_rx)));
> > >
> > > The shift right-hand operand doesn't seem to be correct. Could
> > > anyone confirm this ?
> >
> > You are correct; it's broken.
>
> That code should be replaced with calls to cpm2_clk_setup
> (arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2_common.c). cpm2_clk_setup currently
> supports FCC clock setup only, but I've got a patch to add SCC clock
> setup support. Should I send it ?
>
If you have functional approach, please feel free to send it...
> > > If my assumption is right, could anyone tell me if the MPC82xx
> > > processors are actually supported by the powerpc architecture, or
> > > if the MPC82xx ADS code is just a non-functional work in progress.
> >
once my last changes were committed, 82xx was supported and worked fine.
Pretty long time I had no access to the hardware, hence some minor things might require catch-up.
> > I have a bunch of 8xx/82xx changes pending; I hope to get them
> > cleaned up before the merge window ends.
>
Since I'm the only person covering 8xx/82xx for a while, I definitely want to look at those changes...
> That would be nice. I'll wait for your changes to continue my ppc ->
> powerpc port.
>
> > > I also noticed that U-Boot doesn't have flatten device tree
> > > support for the MPC82xx family.
> >
At the moment, I have a patch to add such a thing, but no ability to validate it still works. If you guys will assist a little,
I'll go ahead and submit it to the u-boot list.
> > No, but cuImage for 82xx is on its way.
>
> Ok, nice to know. Adding FDT support to U-Boot for the MPC82xx family
> will be on my todo-list once I get Linux working with cuImage.
>
> Laurent Pinchart
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-11 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-10 14:19 MPC82xx ADS SCC ports initialisation Laurent Pinchart
2007-07-10 18:11 ` Scott Wood
2007-07-11 7:11 ` Laurent Pinchart
2007-07-11 10:34 ` Vitaly Bordug [this message]
2007-07-11 13:13 ` Laurent Pinchart
2007-07-11 15:21 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070711143422.6b00620e@localhost.localdomain \
--to=vbordug@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@technotrade.biz \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.