From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 1/5] i_version:64 bit inode version
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:57:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070711165724.GD4138@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1184113156.20193.13.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 08:19:16PM -0400, Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 18:22 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > And how does the NFS server know that the filesystem implements i_version?
> > Will a zero-value of i_version have special significance, telling the
> > server to not send this attribute, perhaps?
>
> Bruce raised up this question a few days back when he reviewed this
> patch, I think the solution is add a superblock flag for fs support
> inode versioning, probably at VFS layer?
Sounds fine. As long as it's something that's standard across
filesystems, then I can just do something like
if (sb->s_flags & MS_CHANGEATTR)
/* return i_version to client as change attribute */
else
/* return ctime to client as change attribute */
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-11 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-01 7:37 [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 1/5] i_version:64 bit inode version Mingming Cao
2007-07-02 14:58 ` Mingming Cao
2007-07-03 14:24 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-07-03 21:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-07-03 22:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-07-03 23:32 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-07-03 23:32 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-07-06 13:51 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-07-06 22:53 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-07-09 21:16 ` Mingming Cao
2007-07-10 23:30 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-10 22:09 ` Mingming Cao
2007-07-10 22:09 ` Mingming Cao
2007-07-11 1:22 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-11 0:19 ` Mingming Cao
2007-07-11 0:19 ` Mingming Cao
2007-07-11 4:22 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-11 2:27 ` Mingming Cao
2007-07-11 16:57 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2007-07-11 3:21 ` Neil Brown
2007-07-11 2:09 ` Mingming Cao
2007-07-11 5:17 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-11 5:17 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-11 3:18 ` Mingming Cao
2007-07-11 6:35 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-11 3:34 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-07-11 3:34 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-07-11 11:41 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-07-11 11:41 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-07-11 5:05 ` Neil Brown
2007-07-11 5:22 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-11 5:22 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-11 14:28 ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-07-11 20:04 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-07-11 20:04 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-07-12 4:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-07-11 17:26 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-07-11 17:26 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070711165724.GD4138@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.