From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: kxr@sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 07/12] Memoryless nodes: SLUB support
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:07:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070711170736.f6c304d3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070711182251.433134748@sgi.com>
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:22:26 -0700
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> Simply switch all for_each_online_node to for_each_memory_node. That way
> SLUB only operates on nodes with memory. Any allocation attempt on a
> memoryless node will fall whereupon SLUB will fetch memory from a nearby
> node (depending on how memory policies and cpuset describe fallback).
>
This is as far as I got when a reject storm hit.
> - for_each_online_node(node)
> + for_each_node_state(node, N_MEMORY)
> __kmem_cache_shrink(s, get_node(s, node), scratch);
I can find no sign of any __kmem_cache_shrink's anywhere.
Let's park all this until post-merge-window please. Generally, now is not
a good time for me to be merging 2.6.24 stuff.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-12 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070711182219.234782227@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <20070711182252.138829364@sgi.com>
2007-07-11 18:46 ` [patch 10/12] Memoryless nodes: Update memory policy and page migration Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-11 18:56 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <20070711182252.376540447@sgi.com>
2007-07-11 19:04 ` [patch 11/12] Add N_CPU node state Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <20070711182250.005856256@sgi.com>
2007-07-11 19:06 ` [patch 01/12] NUMA: Generic management of nodemasks for various purposes Christoph Lameter
2007-07-11 19:32 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-20 20:49 ` [PATCH] Memoryless nodes: use "node_memory_map" for cpuset mems_allowed validation Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-20 22:07 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-23 19:09 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-23 19:23 ` Paul Jackson
2007-07-23 20:08 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-23 20:59 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-23 21:48 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-24 14:11 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-24 16:16 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-24 14:15 ` [PATCH take2] " Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-24 16:19 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-24 19:01 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-25 15:50 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-24 20:30 ` [PATCH take3] " Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-25 15:53 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-25 22:00 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-26 13:04 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-27 0:40 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-27 14:15 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-24 20:35 ` [PATCH/RFC] Memoryless nodes: Suppress redundant "node with no memory" messages Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-25 15:56 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
[not found] ` <20070711182251.433134748@sgi.com>
2007-07-12 0:07 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-07-12 1:42 ` [patch 07/12] Memoryless nodes: SLUB support Christoph Lameter
2007-07-12 18:33 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-12 18:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-13 15:14 ` [patch 00/12] NUMA: Memoryless node support V3 Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-13 16:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-13 16:52 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-13 17:20 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-13 17:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-13 19:22 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-13 20:53 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-13 21:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-13 23:18 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
[not found] ` <1185310277.5649.90.camel@localhost>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707241402010.4773@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
[not found] ` <1185372692.5604.22.camel@localhost>
2007-07-25 15:45 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-25 19:16 ` 2.6.23-rc1-mm1: boot hang on ia64 with memoryless nodes Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-25 19:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-25 20:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-25 21:18 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-26 13:53 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-26 13:53 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-26 14:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-07-26 14:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-07-26 18:10 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-26 18:10 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-26 14:33 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-26 14:33 ` Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070711170736.f6c304d3.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kxr@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.