All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rémi Denis-Courmont" <rdenis@simphalempin.com>
To: David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Vlad Yasevich" <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明" <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: optionaly validate RAs on raw sockets
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:19:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200707111919.11746@auguste.remlab.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF12E7973A.D9D0F9C5-ON88257315.005882D0-88257315.0058D5B9@us.ibm.com>

Le mercredi 11 juillet 2007, David Stevens a écrit :
>         That sounds like a good idea to me (FWIW),
> though I also still think a simple raw-socket
> application would do it just fine, possibly with
> no kernel modification at all.
>         But since the kernel wouldn't be maintaining
> the DNS info, which was my real objection to the
> original version,  netlink would work well too.

One remaining corner case is NFS/IPv6 root, whereby userland won't have 
a chance to start before the network, and hence may miss the solicited 
RA. Or would it? By default, the next unsolicited RA can be anytime 
from now to after 10 minutes, so that's not sufficient. I wouldn't 
personnaly care, but...

-- 
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-11 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-10 18:11 [PATCH] IPv6: optionaly validate RAs on raw sockets Remi Denis-Courmont
2007-07-11 12:29 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2007-07-11 12:44   ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2007-07-11 13:20     ` David Stevens
2007-07-11 14:10     ` Vlad Yasevich
2007-07-11 16:10       ` David Stevens
2007-07-11 16:19         ` Rémi Denis-Courmont [this message]
2007-07-11 16:50           ` Vlad Yasevich
2007-07-11 20:56           ` David Miller
2007-07-11 21:17             ` James Morris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200707111919.11746@auguste.remlab.net \
    --to=rdenis@simphalempin.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dlstevens@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.