From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937824AbXGLAoX (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:44:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1765912AbXGLAoH (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:44:07 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:37573 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753003AbXGLAoF (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:44:05 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: generic clockevents/ (hr)time(r) patches was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:43:09 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Stable Team References: <20070710013152.ef2cd200.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070711165751.b703f003.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1184198662.12353.201.camel@chaos> In-Reply-To: <1184198662.12353.201.camel@chaos> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200707120243.09999.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 12 July 2007 02:04, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Andrew, > > On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:57 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > They all look pretty innocuous to me. > > > > Could you please take a second look, decide if any of them should also be > > in 2.6.22.x and let me know? > > i386-hpet-check-if-the-counter-works.patch > pcspkr-use-the-global-pit-lock.patch Ok by me, although I suspect a lot of the cases where the hpet one was needed got resolved with the PCI HPET resource fix But it's still safer to check. However I don't think patches should go into stable before they hit Linus' tree. -Andi