From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Bob Nelson <rrnelson@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linuxfoundation.org>,
oprofile <oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Philippe Elie <phil.el@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Enable SPU switch notification to detect currently active SPU tasks.
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:12:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070713101233.GA12426@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1184283940.16584.5.camel@bnelson60.rchland.ibm.com>
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 06:45:40PM -0500, Bob Nelson wrote:
> We would like this patch included in -mm and in 2.6.23.
Do you plan to submit oprofile support aswell? In that case it's fine
otherwise please send it together with the actual oprofile support.
> +static void notify_spus_active(void)
> +{
> + int node;
> + /* Wake up the active spu_contexts. When the awakened processes
> + * see their "notify_active" flag is set, they will call
> + * spu_switch_notify();
> + */
Small style issue, this should be:
int node;
/*
* Wake up the active spu_contexts.
*
* When the awakened processes see their "notify_active" flag is set,
* they will call spu_switch_notify().
*/
> -static inline int spu_stopped(struct spu_context *ctx, u32 * stat)
> +static inline int spu_stopped(struct spu_context *ctx, u32 *stat)
useless (and wrong) reformatting, please remove.
> -static int spu_run_init(struct spu_context *ctx, u32 * npc)
> +static int spu_run_init(struct spu_context *ctx, u32 *npc)
Same here.
> -static int spu_run_fini(struct spu_context *ctx, u32 * npc,
> - u32 * status)
> +static int spu_run_fini(struct spu_context *ctx, u32 *npc,
> + u32 *status)
Same here.
> + if (unlikely(test_bit(SPU_SCHED_NOTIFY_ACTIVE,
> + &ctx->sched_flags))) {
> + clear_bit(SPU_SCHED_NOTIFY_ACTIVE, &ctx->sched_flags);
this should use test_and_clear_bit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-13 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-12 23:45 [PATCH 1/2] Enable SPU switch notification to detect currently active SPU tasks Bob Nelson
2007-07-13 10:12 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2007-07-13 10:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-13 12:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-13 12:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-13 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070713101233.GA12426@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=akpm@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=phil.el@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=rrnelson@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.