From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tdavis@dsl-only.net Subject: Re: Install of alsa 1.0.14.final on Fedora 7 Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 08:15:37 -0700 Message-ID: <20070714081537.ayf2b2byrxq88kok@webmail.dsl-only.net> References: <20070713124843.59729a4b@localhost.localdomain> <20070714000931.hqd2n4icam20ow8g@webmail.dsl-only.net> <20070714072701.057106a3@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from iron2.pdx.net (iron2.pdx.net [69.64.224.71]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1EE10389E for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 17:15:39 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20070714072701.057106a3@localhost.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: stan Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Quoting stan : > On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 00:09:31 -0700 > tdavis@dsl-only.net wrote: > >> Quoting stan : >> >> > On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:53:47 -0700 >> > tdavis@dsl-only.net wrote: >> > >> >> For RPM based systems, I have a build environment for the drivers, >> >> libs, and utils packages at >> >> http://members.dsl-only.net/~tdavis/my-build.tar.bz2. You need to >> >> be root to build them, but they won't interfere with your rpm >> >> distribution. THe driver rpm will also make a backup of your >> >> current drivers prior to installation. >> >> >> >> Tobin >> >> >> > >> > Hi Tobin, >> > >> > I unpacked the archive and typed make. It created 4 RPMs. >> > Two of them installed, alsa-lib and alsa-lib-devel. When I run a >> > test on the drivers rpm, there are conflicts with the kernel >> > headers already on the box. And I have no sound now, except in the >> > audio configuration screen which is using the 14.rc3 packages. The >> > packages are named with rh7 instead of fc7 as well. >> > >> > Do I have to run make install to get everything working, or is the >> > header incompatability in the drivers a show stopper? >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks. >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Alsa-devel mailing list >> > Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org >> > http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel >> > >> >> I'll have to look at the rpm build process to see why they are named >> RH7 instead of FC7. To install, you should just type "audio_install". >> >> If there is a conflict, just type "rpm -Uvh --force". >> > Thanks Tobin. I was going to upgrade to the latest kernel to see if > the header conflicts would go away. All of the conflicts seem to be > alsa related (surprise, surprise) so should have only positive effect > on compiles. I was concerned about a package update for alsa and what > these different files would do. Should I remove the alsa 14.rc3 > packages? Yes. I just looked at the audio_install script again, and it doesn't upgrade, just forces it's way in (not my script). I also haven't had a chance to work with Fedora Core in a while. When I get back home on Monday (I'm monitoring email while on a sudo vacation), I'll install it in a VM on my desktop system and fix the packaging system to recognize that distro. Tobin