From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch 2/2] x86_64: FIFO ticket spinlocks
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:49:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070716094940.GA23080@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070716094503.GC21464@wotan.suse.de>
* Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:26:46AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > > [...] trylock is more significantly slower, but they are relatively
> > > rare.
> >
> > trylock is the main thing that the spinlock debugging code uses, and
> > SPINLOCK_DEBUG is frequently enabled by distro kernels. OTOH, the cost
> > looks like to be +5 instructions, right? Still ...
>
> Which trylocks do you mean? The lockbreak spinlocks use trylock, but
> those are not used with the ticket version.
the trylocks in lib/spinlock-debug.c:
static void __spin_lock_debug(spinlock_t *lock)
{
...
if (__raw_spin_trylock(&lock->raw_lock))
return;
...
void _raw_spin_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
{
debug_spin_lock_before(lock);
if (unlikely(!__raw_spin_trylock(&lock->raw_lock)))
__spin_lock_debug(lock);
debug_spin_lock_after(lock);
}
am i missing something?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-16 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-16 4:59 [rfc][patch 1/2] spinlock: lockbreak cleanups Nick Piggin
2007-07-16 5:01 ` [rfc][patch 2/2] x86_64: FIFO ticket spinlocks Nick Piggin
2007-07-16 9:16 ` Alan Cox
2007-07-16 9:24 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-16 9:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 9:45 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-16 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-07-16 10:18 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-17 14:25 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-17 15:08 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070716094940.GA23080@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.