From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:19:00 +0200 From: Daniel Simon Message-ID: <20070716181900.3f075bc7@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <46960A4B.5070206@domain.hid> References: <2404.194.199.21.225.1181233422.squirrel@domain.hid> <4668440F.7020706@domain.hid> <20070608124927.1b789a9e@domain.hid> <46693B6B.1010201@domain.hid> <20070625175107.438849fa@domain.hid> <467FF391.8020401@domain.hid> <20070627105726.7db7a459@domain.hid> <46825054.7030800@domain.hid> <20070629164326.15579570@domain.hid> <4690B86C.1000907@domain.hid> <20070711155932.4b88699e@domain.hid> <4694E96B.5020801@domain.hid> <20070711173545.709225f1@domain.hid> <4694FD99.3030405@domain.hid> <20070711185529.62544380@domain.hid> <469549AF.5090102@domain.hid> <20070712113039.14050727@domain.hid> <46960A4B.5070206@domain.hid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] measuring tasks execution time List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: xenomai-core On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:02:35 +0200 Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi Jan, > > -I am thinking about more demanding tests, with intertasks preemption and > > overloads, I have shaked my examples in various ways, with preemptions, overruns and high load on the machine, and the exectime patch behaves well, providing data consistent with the expectations (and with the rt_timer_read() probe when usable). Daniel -- Daniel SIMON Projet NeCS INRIA Rhone-Alpes Inovallee, 655 avenue de l'Europe, Montbonnot 38 334 Saint Ismier Cedex France Daniel.Simon@domain.hid Phone:(33)476615328 Fax:(33)476615252 http://necs.inrialpes.fr/people/simon/