From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.174]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B15DDE47 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 01:15:29 +1000 (EST) From: Arnd Bergmann To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] 82xx: Parse SMC serial device node in DTS Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:22:38 +0200 References: <469B33F9.2080604@windriver.com> <200707171406.03455.arnd@arndb.de> <3D0E2A2D-9ADE-4931-9C73-8E65550C728F@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <3D0E2A2D-9ADE-4931-9C73-8E65550C728F@kernel.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200707171622.38496.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tuesday 17 July 2007, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > If the compatible property contains "fsl,cpm-smc\0cpm_uart", you =A0 > > can scan for > > either of them. The loop will iterate over all cpm_uart compatible =A0 > > devices, > > while the later test will look for an fsl,cpm-smc compatible device. >=20 > Well, "fsl,cpm-uart" (note the two differences), but yes. My point was about the 'smc' part that needs to be added, so I guess if we want to have that in there, it should be "fsl,cpm-smc-uart" really, and "fsl,cpm-scc-uart", respectively. Arnd <><